Party Reforms and the Unbalancing of the Cleavage Structure in Russian Regional Elections, 2012–2015

Cameron Ross (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study analyses the influence of the party reforms of 2012 and the ‘counter-reforms’ of 2013–2014 on the Russian party system, and the structure of political and electoral cleavages in Russian regions. The emergence of new political parties in 2012–2013 led to a temporary increase in electoral competition, an augmentation of the political space, and a rise in the number of electoral cleavages, but these developments did not weaken the domination of United Russia. The trend towards an ever greater tightening up of entry requirements for contestation in the elections led to a lowering of the number of political and, consequently, electoral cleavages, in addition to a reconfiguration of the political space. The study shows that there was an unbalancing of the political cleavage structure in 2012–2015: the socioeconomic political cleavage, whose primary place is a key determinant of equilibrium, ceded the top position to the authoritarian–democratic cleavage in 2012–2013, and to the ‘Ukrainian’ (systemic) cleavage in 2014–2015.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-181
Number of pages27
JournalEurope-Asia Studies
Volume70
Issue number2
Early online date1 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

election
cleavage
reform
political structure
party system
domination
Russia
determinants
trend
Elections
Cleavage

Keywords

  • cleavage structure
  • Russian regional elections
  • political and electoral cleavages
  • party reform in Russia

Cite this

@article{d1ab39dcb4f74f47851d54cf8b451fb2,
title = "Party Reforms and the Unbalancing of the Cleavage Structure in Russian Regional Elections, 2012–2015",
abstract = "This study analyses the influence of the party reforms of 2012 and the ‘counter-reforms’ of 2013–2014 on the Russian party system, and the structure of political and electoral cleavages in Russian regions. The emergence of new political parties in 2012–2013 led to a temporary increase in electoral competition, an augmentation of the political space, and a rise in the number of electoral cleavages, but these developments did not weaken the domination of United Russia. The trend towards an ever greater tightening up of entry requirements for contestation in the elections led to a lowering of the number of political and, consequently, electoral cleavages, in addition to a reconfiguration of the political space. The study shows that there was an unbalancing of the political cleavage structure in 2012–2015: the socioeconomic political cleavage, whose primary place is a key determinant of equilibrium, ceded the top position to the authoritarian–democratic cleavage in 2012–2013, and to the ‘Ukrainian’ (systemic) cleavage in 2014–2015.",
keywords = "cleavage structure, Russian regional elections, political and electoral cleavages, party reform in Russia",
author = "Cameron Ross",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/09668136.2017.1417976",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "155--181",
journal = "Europe-Asia Studies",
issn = "0966-8136",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Party Reforms and the Unbalancing of the Cleavage Structure in Russian Regional Elections, 2012–2015

AU - Ross, Cameron

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This study analyses the influence of the party reforms of 2012 and the ‘counter-reforms’ of 2013–2014 on the Russian party system, and the structure of political and electoral cleavages in Russian regions. The emergence of new political parties in 2012–2013 led to a temporary increase in electoral competition, an augmentation of the political space, and a rise in the number of electoral cleavages, but these developments did not weaken the domination of United Russia. The trend towards an ever greater tightening up of entry requirements for contestation in the elections led to a lowering of the number of political and, consequently, electoral cleavages, in addition to a reconfiguration of the political space. The study shows that there was an unbalancing of the political cleavage structure in 2012–2015: the socioeconomic political cleavage, whose primary place is a key determinant of equilibrium, ceded the top position to the authoritarian–democratic cleavage in 2012–2013, and to the ‘Ukrainian’ (systemic) cleavage in 2014–2015.

AB - This study analyses the influence of the party reforms of 2012 and the ‘counter-reforms’ of 2013–2014 on the Russian party system, and the structure of political and electoral cleavages in Russian regions. The emergence of new political parties in 2012–2013 led to a temporary increase in electoral competition, an augmentation of the political space, and a rise in the number of electoral cleavages, but these developments did not weaken the domination of United Russia. The trend towards an ever greater tightening up of entry requirements for contestation in the elections led to a lowering of the number of political and, consequently, electoral cleavages, in addition to a reconfiguration of the political space. The study shows that there was an unbalancing of the political cleavage structure in 2012–2015: the socioeconomic political cleavage, whose primary place is a key determinant of equilibrium, ceded the top position to the authoritarian–democratic cleavage in 2012–2013, and to the ‘Ukrainian’ (systemic) cleavage in 2014–2015.

KW - cleavage structure

KW - Russian regional elections

KW - political and electoral cleavages

KW - party reform in Russia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041564611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09668136.2017.1417976

DO - 10.1080/09668136.2017.1417976

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 155

EP - 181

JO - Europe-Asia Studies

JF - Europe-Asia Studies

SN - 0966-8136

IS - 2

ER -