Patients' experiences and views of clinical trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article explores whether the experience of participating in a clinical trial was similar to what patient volunteers had expected, prior to agreeing to take part. It also considers patients' views on four aspects of participation that may help to determine whether the decision to become a research subject was truly an autonomous one, namely: whether patients feel that (i) doctors 'know best' when it comes to taking part in a trial; (ii) refusing to take part would upset the doctor; (iii) there is little risk associated with participation, and (iv) people have a moral duty to be involved in such trials. Findings: More than a third of patients had no particular expectations of what trial participation would be like. Over half did not believe that doctors knew best about whether or not they should participate, and the vast majority rejected the proposition that a refusal to participate would have upset the doctor. Half of the patients believed that there was little risk in testing new drugs, and most felt that people do not have a moral duty to become research subjects.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)143-152
    Number of pages10
    JournalMedicine and Law
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    Clinical Trials
    Moral Obligations
    Research Subjects
    participation
    experience
    Refusal to Participate
    Volunteers
    drug
    Pharmaceutical Preparations

    Keywords

    • Medical research
    • Clinical trials

    Cite this

    @article{20672998ea514fb784dc36fa988e6777,
    title = "Patients' experiences and views of clinical trials",
    abstract = "This article explores whether the experience of participating in a clinical trial was similar to what patient volunteers had expected, prior to agreeing to take part. It also considers patients' views on four aspects of participation that may help to determine whether the decision to become a research subject was truly an autonomous one, namely: whether patients feel that (i) doctors 'know best' when it comes to taking part in a trial; (ii) refusing to take part would upset the doctor; (iii) there is little risk associated with participation, and (iv) people have a moral duty to be involved in such trials. Findings: More than a third of patients had no particular expectations of what trial participation would be like. Over half did not believe that doctors knew best about whether or not they should participate, and the vast majority rejected the proposition that a refusal to participate would have upset the doctor. Half of the patients believed that there was little risk in testing new drugs, and most felt that people do not have a moral duty to become research subjects.",
    keywords = "Medical research, Clinical trials",
    author = "Pamela Ferguson",
    note = "dc.publisher: International Centre of Medicine and Law",
    year = "2001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "143--152",
    journal = "Medicine and Law",
    issn = "0723-1393",
    publisher = "Yozmot Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    Patients' experiences and views of clinical trials. / Ferguson, Pamela.

    In: Medicine and Law, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2001, p. 143-152.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Patients' experiences and views of clinical trials

    AU - Ferguson, Pamela

    N1 - dc.publisher: International Centre of Medicine and Law

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - This article explores whether the experience of participating in a clinical trial was similar to what patient volunteers had expected, prior to agreeing to take part. It also considers patients' views on four aspects of participation that may help to determine whether the decision to become a research subject was truly an autonomous one, namely: whether patients feel that (i) doctors 'know best' when it comes to taking part in a trial; (ii) refusing to take part would upset the doctor; (iii) there is little risk associated with participation, and (iv) people have a moral duty to be involved in such trials. Findings: More than a third of patients had no particular expectations of what trial participation would be like. Over half did not believe that doctors knew best about whether or not they should participate, and the vast majority rejected the proposition that a refusal to participate would have upset the doctor. Half of the patients believed that there was little risk in testing new drugs, and most felt that people do not have a moral duty to become research subjects.

    AB - This article explores whether the experience of participating in a clinical trial was similar to what patient volunteers had expected, prior to agreeing to take part. It also considers patients' views on four aspects of participation that may help to determine whether the decision to become a research subject was truly an autonomous one, namely: whether patients feel that (i) doctors 'know best' when it comes to taking part in a trial; (ii) refusing to take part would upset the doctor; (iii) there is little risk associated with participation, and (iv) people have a moral duty to be involved in such trials. Findings: More than a third of patients had no particular expectations of what trial participation would be like. Over half did not believe that doctors knew best about whether or not they should participate, and the vast majority rejected the proposition that a refusal to participate would have upset the doctor. Half of the patients believed that there was little risk in testing new drugs, and most felt that people do not have a moral duty to become research subjects.

    KW - Medical research

    KW - Clinical trials

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 143

    EP - 152

    JO - Medicine and Law

    JF - Medicine and Law

    SN - 0723-1393

    IS - 1

    ER -