Peer and Self-Assessment

Keith James Topping

doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7

Peer and Self-Assessment

Keith James Topping (Lead / Corresponding author)

Education and Society

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peer assessment is learners considering and specifying the level, value or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners. Self-assessment is learners making judgements of merit/worth about their learning processes and outcomes of their learning - identifying standards and/or criteria and making judgements about the extent to which they have met them. Both appear equally effective, are used in a wide variety of subjects, and increasingly involve technology. Co-designing explicit criteria with students (yielding rubrics) and managing self-efficacy are major factors, leading to self-regulation of learning. Training is important and critical thinking a frequent outcome.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	International Encyclopedia of Education
Editors	Rob Tierney, Fazal Rizvi, Kadriye Ercikan
Place of Publication	Oxford
Publisher	Elsevier
Chapter	9021
Pages	79-88
Number of pages	10
Volume	9
Edition	4
ISBN (Electronic)	9780128186299
ISBN (Print)	9780128186305
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7
Publication status	Published - 2023

Keywords

Effects
Peer assessment
Primary school
Secondary school
Self-assessment
University

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Social Sciences

Access to Document

10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7

Cite this

@inbook{b8a97d90784e458bbb3ce4e89d6dd359,

title = "Peer and Self-Assessment",

abstract = "Peer assessment is learners considering and specifying the level, value or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners. Self-assessment is learners making judgements of merit/worth about their learning processes and outcomes of their learning - identifying standards and/or criteria and making judgements about the extent to which they have met them. Both appear equally effective, are used in a wide variety of subjects, and increasingly involve technology. Co-designing explicit criteria with students (yielding rubrics) and managing self-efficacy are major factors, leading to self-regulation of learning. Training is important and critical thinking a frequent outcome.",

keywords = "Effects, Peer assessment, Primary school, Secondary school, Self-assessment, University",

author = "Topping, \{Keith James\}",

note = "Copyright: {\textcopyright} Elsevier Science 2022",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780128186305",

volume = "9",

pages = "79--88",

editor = "Rob Tierney and Fazal Rizvi and Kadriye Ercikan",

booktitle = "International Encyclopedia of Education",

publisher = "Elsevier",

address = "Netherlands",

edition = "4",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Peer and Self-Assessment

AU - Topping, Keith James

N1 - Copyright: © Elsevier Science 2022

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Peer assessment is learners considering and specifying the level, value or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners. Self-assessment is learners making judgements of merit/worth about their learning processes and outcomes of their learning - identifying standards and/or criteria and making judgements about the extent to which they have met them. Both appear equally effective, are used in a wide variety of subjects, and increasingly involve technology. Co-designing explicit criteria with students (yielding rubrics) and managing self-efficacy are major factors, leading to self-regulation of learning. Training is important and critical thinking a frequent outcome.

AB - Peer assessment is learners considering and specifying the level, value or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners. Self-assessment is learners making judgements of merit/worth about their learning processes and outcomes of their learning - identifying standards and/or criteria and making judgements about the extent to which they have met them. Both appear equally effective, are used in a wide variety of subjects, and increasingly involve technology. Co-designing explicit criteria with students (yielding rubrics) and managing self-efficacy are major factors, leading to self-regulation of learning. Training is important and critical thinking a frequent outcome.

KW - Effects

KW - Peer assessment

KW - Primary school

KW - Secondary school

KW - Self-assessment

KW - University

UR - https://www.elsevier.com/books/international-encyclopedia-of-education/tierney/978-0-12-818629-9

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85150570122

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7

M3 - Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary

SN - 9780128186305

VL - 9

SP - 79

EP - 88

BT - International Encyclopedia of Education

A2 - Tierney, Rob

A2 - Rizvi, Fazal

A2 - Ercikan, Kadriye

PB - Elsevier

CY - Oxford

ER -

Peer and Self-Assessment

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this