Peer Assessment: Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

263 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Peer assessment can be defined as “an arrangement for learners to consider and specify the level, value, or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners, then learn further by giving elaborated feedback and discussing their judgements with peers to achieve a negotiated agreed outcome.” It is organized in elementary (primary) and high (secondary) school classrooms and universities and colleges, but also in practitioner staffrooms and among teachers in training. There are many kinds of peer assessment, and factors in its variations are outlined. The evidence on the effectiveness of peer assessment is then reviewed. Four databases (ERIC, Science Direct, Scopus, and ZETOC) were searched using the terms "peer assessment" and school* or university* or college. Some 230 papers of various quality were retrieved initially. For college/university, only reviews were reported here. Finally 43 papers of higher quality were selected as highly relevant. These mainly found that peer assessment was effective; only two finding otherwise. Some studies reported gains in meta-cognition and transferable skills in addition. Teachers in all sectors might consider or develop the use of the elaborated feedback form of peer assessment. Practical guidelines to aid this are given.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalInterdisciplinary Education and Psychology
Volume1
Issue number1
Early online date18 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

learning
university
teacher
cognition
secondary school
classroom
science
school
performance
evidence
Values

Keywords

  • Peer assessment
  • Discussion
  • Elaborated feedback
  • Elementary
  • High school
  • University
  • College

Cite this

Topping, Keith. / Peer Assessment : Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners. In: Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 1-17.
@article{6b863218abb04727803fa41e97fa75ab,
title = "Peer Assessment: Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners",
abstract = "Peer assessment can be defined as “an arrangement for learners to consider and specify the level, value, or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners, then learn further by giving elaborated feedback and discussing their judgements with peers to achieve a negotiated agreed outcome.” It is organized in elementary (primary) and high (secondary) school classrooms and universities and colleges, but also in practitioner staffrooms and among teachers in training. There are many kinds of peer assessment, and factors in its variations are outlined. The evidence on the effectiveness of peer assessment is then reviewed. Four databases (ERIC, Science Direct, Scopus, and ZETOC) were searched using the terms {"}peer assessment{"} and school* or university* or college. Some 230 papers of various quality were retrieved initially. For college/university, only reviews were reported here. Finally 43 papers of higher quality were selected as highly relevant. These mainly found that peer assessment was effective; only two finding otherwise. Some studies reported gains in meta-cognition and transferable skills in addition. Teachers in all sectors might consider or develop the use of the elaborated feedback form of peer assessment. Practical guidelines to aid this are given.",
keywords = "Peer assessment, Discussion, Elaborated feedback, Elementary, High school, University, College",
author = "Keith Topping",
note = "This work did not receive any funding. The author has no conflict of interest to declare.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.1.1.007",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--17",
number = "1",

}

Peer Assessment : Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners. / Topping, Keith.

In: Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 7, 12.2017, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer Assessment

T2 - Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners

AU - Topping, Keith

N1 - This work did not receive any funding. The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Peer assessment can be defined as “an arrangement for learners to consider and specify the level, value, or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners, then learn further by giving elaborated feedback and discussing their judgements with peers to achieve a negotiated agreed outcome.” It is organized in elementary (primary) and high (secondary) school classrooms and universities and colleges, but also in practitioner staffrooms and among teachers in training. There are many kinds of peer assessment, and factors in its variations are outlined. The evidence on the effectiveness of peer assessment is then reviewed. Four databases (ERIC, Science Direct, Scopus, and ZETOC) were searched using the terms "peer assessment" and school* or university* or college. Some 230 papers of various quality were retrieved initially. For college/university, only reviews were reported here. Finally 43 papers of higher quality were selected as highly relevant. These mainly found that peer assessment was effective; only two finding otherwise. Some studies reported gains in meta-cognition and transferable skills in addition. Teachers in all sectors might consider or develop the use of the elaborated feedback form of peer assessment. Practical guidelines to aid this are given.

AB - Peer assessment can be defined as “an arrangement for learners to consider and specify the level, value, or quality of a product or performance of other equal-status learners, then learn further by giving elaborated feedback and discussing their judgements with peers to achieve a negotiated agreed outcome.” It is organized in elementary (primary) and high (secondary) school classrooms and universities and colleges, but also in practitioner staffrooms and among teachers in training. There are many kinds of peer assessment, and factors in its variations are outlined. The evidence on the effectiveness of peer assessment is then reviewed. Four databases (ERIC, Science Direct, Scopus, and ZETOC) were searched using the terms "peer assessment" and school* or university* or college. Some 230 papers of various quality were retrieved initially. For college/university, only reviews were reported here. Finally 43 papers of higher quality were selected as highly relevant. These mainly found that peer assessment was effective; only two finding otherwise. Some studies reported gains in meta-cognition and transferable skills in addition. Teachers in all sectors might consider or develop the use of the elaborated feedback form of peer assessment. Practical guidelines to aid this are given.

KW - Peer assessment

KW - Discussion

KW - Elaborated feedback

KW - Elementary

KW - High school

KW - University

KW - College

U2 - 10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.1.1.007

DO - 10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.1.1.007

M3 - Review article

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 17

IS - 1

M1 - 7

ER -