Peer tutoring in reading in Scotland: thinking big

Keith Topping, David Miller, Allen Thurston, Karen McGavock, Nora Conlin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A large-scale randomised-controlled trial of reading tutoring in 80 schools in Scotland used the Paired Reading (PR) technique. On long-term evaluation, cross-age PR was significantly better than regular teaching, but same-age was not. On short-term evaluation, PR pupils did significantly better than control pupils in both years, and cross-age and same-age were similarly effective. Low socio-economic pupils, lower reading ability pupils, girls and reading with maths tutoring groups did significantly better. Implementation was good in parts, but some important aspects of technique were rare. Reading gains were significantly greater for those with mistakes about every 2 minutes and those who stopped reading to talk every 5 to 7 minutes. Significant gains in self-esteem were seen in same-age and cross-age groups, and for tutees and tutors, but not for controls. The relationship of achievement gain to quality of technique and socio-emotional gains is discussed, with implications for practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-9
    Number of pages7
    JournalLiteracy
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    Early online date28 Mar 2011
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

    Keywords

    • Reading
    • Peer tutor
    • Randomised-controlled trial
    • Achievement
    • Implementation
    • Self-esteem

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Peer tutoring in reading in Scotland: thinking big'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this