Abstract
The performance of 3 different CFD numerical approaches, namely RANS, URANS and LES are evaluated to determine their suitability in the prediction of airflow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons. Numerical results are evaluated against wind tunnel experimental data available from an online database (www.codasc.de). LES was observed to produce more accurate and reliable results compared to both RANS approaches, because LES resolves the inherent fluctuations, thus capturing the turbulent mixing process in the flow field within the canyon. Although URANS also computes for transience, it fails to account for unsteadiness, and hence is not an appropriate replacement for LES.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering |
Pages | 263-274 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Volume | 170 LNEE |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Event | World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, WCES 2011 - San Francisco, CA, United States Duration: 19 Oct 2011 → 21 Oct 2011 http://www.iaeng.org/WCECS2011/ |
Publication series
Name | Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering |
---|---|
Volume | 170 LNEE |
ISSN (Print) | 18761100 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 18761119 |
Conference
Conference | World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, WCES 2011 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | San Francisco, CA |
Period | 19/10/11 → 21/10/11 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Air pollution
- CFD
- LES
- RANS
- URANS
- Urban street canyon
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering