Post-Hospitalisation COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R): A randomised controlled trial of exercise-based rehabilitation

  • , Enya Daynes (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Rachael A. Evans
  • , Neil J. Greening
  • , Nicolette C Bishop
  • , Thomas Yates
  • , Daniel Lozano-Rojas
  • , Kimon Ntotsis
  • , Matthew Richardson
  • , Molly Baldwin
  • , Malik Hamrouni
  • , Emily Hume
  • , Hamish J. C. McAuley
  • , George E. Mills
  • , Dimitrios Megaritis
  • , Matthew D Roberts
  • , Charlotte E. Bolton
  • , James Chalmers
  • , Trudie Chalder
  • , Annemarie B Docherty
  • Omer Elneima, Ewen M Harrison, Victoria C. Harris, Ling-Pei Ho, Alexander Horsley, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Olivia C. Leavy, Michael Marks, Krishna Poinasamy, Jennifer K. Quint, Betty Raman, Ruth M. Saunders, Aarti Shikotra, Amisha Singapuri, Marco Sereno, Sarah Terry, Louise V. Wain, William D-C Man, Carlos Echevarria, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Christopher E. Brightling, Sally J. Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective Post-COVID syndrome involves prolonged symptoms with multisystem and functional impairment lasting ≽12 weeks after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the efficacy of exercise-based rehabilitation interventions, either face-to-face or remote, compared to usual care in individuals experiencing post-COVID syndrome following a hospitalisation with acute COVID-19. Design This single-blind randomised controlled trial compared two exercise-based rehabilitation interventions (face-to-face or remote) to usual care in participants with post-COVID syndrome following a hospitalisation. The interventions were either a face-to-face or remote 8-week programme of individually prescribed exercise and education. The primary outcome was the change in Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) following 8 weeks of intervention (either face-to-face or remote) compared to usual care. Other secondary outcomes were measured including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and exploratory outcomes included lymphocyte immunotyping. Results 181 participants (55% male, mean±SD age 59±12 years, length of hospital stay 12±19 days) were randomised. There was an improvement in the ISWT distance following face-to-face rehabilitation (mean 52 m, 95% CI 19–85 m; p=0.002) and remote rehabilitation (mean 34 m, 95% CI 1–66 m; p=0.047) compared to usual care alone. There were no differences between groups for HRQoL self-reported symptoms. Analysis of immune markers revealed significant increases in naïve and memory CD8 + T-cells following face-to-face rehabilitation versus usual care alone (p<0.001, n=31). Conclusion Exercise-based rehabilitation improved short-term exercise capacity in post-COVID syndrome following an acute hospitalisation and showed potential for beneficial immunomodulatory effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2402152
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume65
Issue number5
Early online date20 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-Hospitalisation COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R): A randomised controlled trial of exercise-based rehabilitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this