TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-Hospitalisation COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R)
T2 - A randomised controlled trial of exercise-based rehabilitation
AU - Daynes, Enya
AU - Evans, Rachael A.
AU - Greening, Neil J.
AU - Bishop, Nicolette C
AU - Yates, Thomas
AU - Lozano-Rojas, Daniel
AU - Ntotsis, Kimon
AU - Richardson, Matthew
AU - Baldwin, Molly
AU - Hamrouni, Malik
AU - Hume, Emily
AU - McAuley, Hamish J. C.
AU - Mills, George E.
AU - Megaritis, Dimitrios
AU - Roberts, Matthew D
AU - Bolton, Charlotte E.
AU - Chalmers, James
AU - Chalder, Trudie
AU - Docherty, Annemarie B
AU - Elneima, Omer
AU - Harrison, Ewen M
AU - Harris, Victoria C.
AU - Ho, Ling-Pei
AU - Horsley, Alexander
AU - Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
AU - Leavy, Olivia C.
AU - Marks, Michael
AU - Poinasamy, Krishna
AU - Quint, Jennifer K.
AU - Raman, Betty
AU - Saunders, Ruth M.
AU - Shikotra, Aarti
AU - Singapuri, Amisha
AU - Sereno, Marco
AU - Terry, Sarah
AU - Wain, Louise V.
AU - Man, William D-C
AU - Echevarria, Carlos
AU - Vogiatzis, Ioannis
AU - Brightling, Christopher E.
AU - Singh, Sally J.
AU - George, J
N1 - Copyright:
©The authors 2025
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective Post-COVID syndrome involves prolonged symptoms with multisystem and functional impairment lasting ≽12 weeks after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the efficacy of exercise-based rehabilitation interventions, either face-to-face or remote, compared to usual care in individuals experiencing post-COVID syndrome following a hospitalisation with acute COVID-19. Design This single-blind randomised controlled trial compared two exercise-based rehabilitation interventions (face-to-face or remote) to usual care in participants with post-COVID syndrome following a hospitalisation. The interventions were either a face-to-face or remote 8-week programme of individually prescribed exercise and education. The primary outcome was the change in Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) following 8 weeks of intervention (either face-to-face or remote) compared to usual care. Other secondary outcomes were measured including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and exploratory outcomes included lymphocyte immunotyping. Results 181 participants (55% male, mean±SD age 59±12 years, length of hospital stay 12±19 days) were randomised. There was an improvement in the ISWT distance following face-to-face rehabilitation (mean 52 m, 95% CI 19–85 m; p=0.002) and remote rehabilitation (mean 34 m, 95% CI 1–66 m; p=0.047) compared to usual care alone. There were no differences between groups for HRQoL self-reported symptoms. Analysis of immune markers revealed significant increases in naïve and memory CD8
+ T-cells following face-to-face rehabilitation versus usual care alone (p<0.001, n=31). Conclusion Exercise-based rehabilitation improved short-term exercise capacity in post-COVID syndrome following an acute hospitalisation and showed potential for beneficial immunomodulatory effects.
AB - Objective Post-COVID syndrome involves prolonged symptoms with multisystem and functional impairment lasting ≽12 weeks after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the efficacy of exercise-based rehabilitation interventions, either face-to-face or remote, compared to usual care in individuals experiencing post-COVID syndrome following a hospitalisation with acute COVID-19. Design This single-blind randomised controlled trial compared two exercise-based rehabilitation interventions (face-to-face or remote) to usual care in participants with post-COVID syndrome following a hospitalisation. The interventions were either a face-to-face or remote 8-week programme of individually prescribed exercise and education. The primary outcome was the change in Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) following 8 weeks of intervention (either face-to-face or remote) compared to usual care. Other secondary outcomes were measured including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and exploratory outcomes included lymphocyte immunotyping. Results 181 participants (55% male, mean±SD age 59±12 years, length of hospital stay 12±19 days) were randomised. There was an improvement in the ISWT distance following face-to-face rehabilitation (mean 52 m, 95% CI 19–85 m; p=0.002) and remote rehabilitation (mean 34 m, 95% CI 1–66 m; p=0.047) compared to usual care alone. There were no differences between groups for HRQoL self-reported symptoms. Analysis of immune markers revealed significant increases in naïve and memory CD8
+ T-cells following face-to-face rehabilitation versus usual care alone (p<0.001, n=31). Conclusion Exercise-based rehabilitation improved short-term exercise capacity in post-COVID syndrome following an acute hospitalisation and showed potential for beneficial immunomodulatory effects.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007459163
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.02152-2024
DO - 10.1183/13993003.02152-2024
M3 - Article
C2 - 39978856
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 65
JO - European Respiratory Journal
JF - European Respiratory Journal
IS - 5
M1 - 2402152
ER -