Pre-service and in-service education and training for maternal and newborn care providers in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence review and gap analysis

Background: Good quality midwifery care has the potential to reduce both maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity in high, low, and lower-middle income countries (LMIC) and needs to be underpinned by effective education. There is considerable variation in the quality of midwifery education provided globally.

Objective: To determine what are the most efficient and effective ways for LMICs to conduct pre-service and in-service education and training in order to adequately equip care providers to provide quality maternal and newborn care.

Design: Rapid Systematic Evidence Review

Methods: A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: Medline, CINAHL, LILACs, PsycInfo, ERIC, and MIDIRs. Studies that evaluated the effects of pre-service and in-service education that were specifically designed to train, educate or upskill care providers in order to provide quality maternal and newborn care were included. Data was extracted and presented narratively.

Findings: Nineteen studies were included in the review. Of these seven were evaluations of pre-service education programmes and 12 were evaluations of in-service education programmes. Whilst studies demonstrated positive effects on knowledge and skills, there was a lack of information on whether this translated into behaviour change and positive effects for women and babies. Moreover, the level of the evidence was low and studies often lacked an educational framework and theoretical basis. Mapping the skills taught in each of the programmes to the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care framework (Renfrew et al., 2014) identified that interventions focused on very specific or individual clinical skills and not on the broader scope of midwifery.

Key conclusions: There is a very limited quantity and quality of peer reviewed published studies of the effectiveness of pre service and in service midwifery education in LMICs; this is at odds with the importance of the topic to survival, health and well-being. There is a preponderance of studies which focus on training for specific emergencies during labour and birth. None of the in-service programmes considered the education of midwives to international standards with the full scope of competencies needed. There is an urgent need for the development of theoretically informed pre-service and in-service midwifery education programmes, and well-conducted evaluations of such programmes. Upscaling quality midwifery care for all women and newborn infants is of critical importance to accelerate progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 3. Quality midwifery education is an essential pre-requisite for quality care. To deliver SDG 3, the startling underinvestment in midwifery education identified in this review must be reversed.