Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms

Felicity Borrie, Donald Thomson, Grant T. McIntyre

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The objective of this study was to determine whether the accuracy of measurement data from inverted greyscale digital cephalometric radiographs equals that obtained from conventional negative digital cephalometric radiographs. Fifty-five consecutively lateral cephalometric radiographs from a university orthodontic clinic obtained for treatment planning were used for this study. A 5 MB conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' TIFF digital image of each radiograph was produced. These were allocated a unique identifier and were analysed in random order by one clinician. Eighteen cephalometric landmarks were digitized using the Opal 2.1 package and the angles were calculated. The angular measurements were compared using two-sample t-tests (P < 0.05).

    The angular measurements from the conventional negative bones white and inverted greyscale bones black lateral cephalometric radiographs were neither statistically significantly different nor clinically different from each other. Therefore, measurements derived from conventional negative bones white and inverted greyscale bones black lateral cephalometric radiographs have a similar level of precision.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-61
    Number of pages5
    JournalEuropean Journal of Orthodontics
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

    Keywords

    • HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS
    • CEPHALOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS
    • LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION
    • REPRODUCIBILITY
    • RELIABILITY
    • IMAGES
    • ERROR

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this