TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors and risk factors for admission to critical care in cervicofacial infections
T2 - a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) study
AU - ES Dawoud, B.
AU - Kent, S.
AU - Henry, A.
AU - McDonald, C.
AU - Kyzas, P.
AU - McCaul, J.
AU - Java, Kapil
AU - Keria, Ashwin
AU - Ng, Teresa
AU - Kawalec, Alex
AU - Gowrishankar, Siddharth
AU - Grant, Jamie
AU - Elledge, Ross
AU - Mohindra, Annesh
AU - Madattigowda, Ramachandra
AU - O'Connor, Rory
AU - Tudor-Green, Ben
AU - Tavakoli, Milad
AU - Garg, Montey
AU - Wareing, Jonathan
AU - Kulkarni, Raghav
AU - Exley, Rebecca
AU - Wicks, Catherine
AU - Mitchell, Oliver
AU - Maarouf, Marwa
AU - Chohan, Priya
AU - Otukoya, Rachel
AU - Wu, Eiling
AU - Farooq, Saadia
AU - Uppal, Sharonjeet
AU - Shaheen, Syca
AU - Reedy, Nagarjuna
AU - Vithalani, Gauri
AU - Underwood, Charlotte
AU - Swain, Aoife
AU - Brewer, Esther
AU - Cairns, Mark
AU - Logan, Greg
AU - Cashman, Helen
AU - Wareing, Sam
AU - King, Hudson
AU - Stevenson, Sam
AU - Collins, Tim
AU - Davies, Rhodri
AU - Baniulyte, Gabriele
AU - Watson, Melanie
AU - Murray, Susan
AU - Stephanus Brandsma, Dirk
AU - Stiles, Ellis
AU - Davies, Laurie
N1 - Funding Information:
MTReC wishes to acknowledge all trainee collaborators involved in the data capture for this study (Table 3) and all consultants whose patients are included in the dataset. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Cervicofacial infections carry significant morbidity. Patients present on a broad spectrum of severity, with some requiring outpatient management and others admission to higher level care. Recognition of risk factors is helpful in decision making regarding the need for admission to higher level care. Prospective data were captured on 1002 patients in 25 centres across 17 regions of the United Kingdom (UK) by the Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC). Patients admitted to critical care were compared with those who received ward-level care. Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify predictors for critical care admission. Our results show that the best predictor for critical care admission is the presence of three or more features of airway compromise (AUC 0.779), followed by C-reactive protein (CRP) >100 mg/L (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.59 to 4.58; p < 0.005), submandibular space involvement (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.870 to 7.81; p = 0.003), white cell count (WCC) >12 × 109/ dl (1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10; p = 0.03), and positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR 2.78; CI 1.35 to 5.80; p = 0.006). Admission to critical care is multifactorial, however, the presence of three or more features of airway compromise is the best predictor. Awareness of this alongside other key clinical findings in cervicofacial infections may allow for the early recognition of patients who may require escalation to critical care.
AB - Cervicofacial infections carry significant morbidity. Patients present on a broad spectrum of severity, with some requiring outpatient management and others admission to higher level care. Recognition of risk factors is helpful in decision making regarding the need for admission to higher level care. Prospective data were captured on 1002 patients in 25 centres across 17 regions of the United Kingdom (UK) by the Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC). Patients admitted to critical care were compared with those who received ward-level care. Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify predictors for critical care admission. Our results show that the best predictor for critical care admission is the presence of three or more features of airway compromise (AUC 0.779), followed by C-reactive protein (CRP) >100 mg/L (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.59 to 4.58; p < 0.005), submandibular space involvement (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.870 to 7.81; p = 0.003), white cell count (WCC) >12 × 109/ dl (1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10; p = 0.03), and positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR 2.78; CI 1.35 to 5.80; p = 0.006). Admission to critical care is multifactorial, however, the presence of three or more features of airway compromise is the best predictor. Awareness of this alongside other key clinical findings in cervicofacial infections may allow for the early recognition of patients who may require escalation to critical care.
KW - Critical care
KW - Infections
KW - Research
KW - Surgery
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.09.015
DO - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.09.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 36513528
AN - SCOPUS:85146857802
SN - 0266-4356
VL - 61
SP - 78
EP - 83
JO - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 1
ER -