TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors up to 5 years after end of treatment
T2 - a cross-sectional survey
AU - Wells, Mary
AU - Swartzman, Samantha
AU - Lang, Heidi
AU - Cunningham, Margaret
AU - Taylor, Lesley
AU - Thomson, Jane
AU - Philp, Julie
AU - McCowan, Colin
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to assess quality of life (QoL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and determine factors predictive of poor QoL in the first 5 years after the end of treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional survey, including the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) measure, was sent to HNC survivors in three Scottish health regions, with responses linked to routinely collected clinical data. Independent sample t tests, ANOVAs, Pearson correlations and multiple hierarchical regressions were used to explore associations between and to determine the contribution made by demographic, lifestyle and clinical factors to predicting ‘generic’ and ‘cancer-specific’ quality of life. Results: Two hundred eighty patients (65 %) returned questionnaires. After adjustment, multivariate analysis showed that younger age, lower socio-economic status, unemployment and self-reported comorbidity independently contributed to poorer generic and cancer-specific quality of life. In addition to these factors, having had a feeding tube or a diagnosis of oral cavity cancer were independently predictive of poorer cancer-specific quality of life. Conclusions: Socio-economic factors and comorbidity are important predictors of QoL in HNC survivors. These factors and the detrimental long-term effects of feeding tubes need further attention in research and practice.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to assess quality of life (QoL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and determine factors predictive of poor QoL in the first 5 years after the end of treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional survey, including the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) measure, was sent to HNC survivors in three Scottish health regions, with responses linked to routinely collected clinical data. Independent sample t tests, ANOVAs, Pearson correlations and multiple hierarchical regressions were used to explore associations between and to determine the contribution made by demographic, lifestyle and clinical factors to predicting ‘generic’ and ‘cancer-specific’ quality of life. Results: Two hundred eighty patients (65 %) returned questionnaires. After adjustment, multivariate analysis showed that younger age, lower socio-economic status, unemployment and self-reported comorbidity independently contributed to poorer generic and cancer-specific quality of life. In addition to these factors, having had a feeding tube or a diagnosis of oral cavity cancer were independently predictive of poorer cancer-specific quality of life. Conclusions: Socio-economic factors and comorbidity are important predictors of QoL in HNC survivors. These factors and the detrimental long-term effects of feeding tubes need further attention in research and practice.
KW - Feeding tube
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Quality of life
KW - Socio-economic status
KW - Survivors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949664353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-015-3045-6
DO - 10.1007/s00520-015-3045-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 26660345
AN - SCOPUS:84949664353
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 24
SP - 2463
EP - 2472
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 6
ER -
