Preliminary study of the comparison of inked barefoot impressions with impressions from shoe insoles using a controlled population

Lesley Hammer (Lead / Corresponding author), Niamh Nic Daéid, Robert B. Kennedy, A. Brian Yamashita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Barefoot morphology comparison examines the shapes the weight-bearing areas of a foot make in its impression to try to determine whether a suspect can be excluded as the person who made a crime scene impression or included as someone who could have made the impression. In some cases, an examiner is asked to compare a suspect's barefoot impression with an impression left by a foot on the insole of a shoe. Because of the constriction of the foot caused by the shoe, the comparison is not as straightforward, and the approach to the comparison must be suitably conservative. In this paper, we provide the results of a series of experiments designed to provide some validation for this type of examination. Inked impressions were compared to inked impressions, shoe insoles were compared to shoe insoles, and, most importantly, inked impressions were compared to shoe insoles. The "like versus like" comparison results (undertaken with known inked impressions or known shoe insole impressions) were evaluated against comparisons of inked impressions with corresponding insole impressions. The like versus like comparisons demonstrated better correspondences, and the comparison of inked impressions with shoe insoles demonstrated that the closest correspondence was for impressions made by the same person as opposed to impressions made by different people.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-622
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Forensic Identification
Volume62
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Shoes
Population
Foot
Weight-Bearing
Crime
Constriction

Cite this

@article{793e5b8729bd4ea5bff6cfa7673aea31,
title = "Preliminary study of the comparison of inked barefoot impressions with impressions from shoe insoles using a controlled population",
abstract = "Barefoot morphology comparison examines the shapes the weight-bearing areas of a foot make in its impression to try to determine whether a suspect can be excluded as the person who made a crime scene impression or included as someone who could have made the impression. In some cases, an examiner is asked to compare a suspect's barefoot impression with an impression left by a foot on the insole of a shoe. Because of the constriction of the foot caused by the shoe, the comparison is not as straightforward, and the approach to the comparison must be suitably conservative. In this paper, we provide the results of a series of experiments designed to provide some validation for this type of examination. Inked impressions were compared to inked impressions, shoe insoles were compared to shoe insoles, and, most importantly, inked impressions were compared to shoe insoles. The {"}like versus like{"} comparison results (undertaken with known inked impressions or known shoe insole impressions) were evaluated against comparisons of inked impressions with corresponding insole impressions. The like versus like comparisons demonstrated better correspondences, and the comparison of inked impressions with shoe insoles demonstrated that the closest correspondence was for impressions made by the same person as opposed to impressions made by different people.",
author = "Lesley Hammer and Da{\'e}id, {Niamh Nic} and Kennedy, {Robert B.} and Yamashita, {A. Brian}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "603--622",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Identification",
issn = "0895-173X",
publisher = "International Association for Identification",
number = "6",

}

Preliminary study of the comparison of inked barefoot impressions with impressions from shoe insoles using a controlled population. / Hammer, Lesley (Lead / Corresponding author); Daéid, Niamh Nic; Kennedy, Robert B.; Yamashita, A. Brian.

In: Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 62, No. 6, 11.2012, p. 603-622.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary study of the comparison of inked barefoot impressions with impressions from shoe insoles using a controlled population

AU - Hammer, Lesley

AU - Daéid, Niamh Nic

AU - Kennedy, Robert B.

AU - Yamashita, A. Brian

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Barefoot morphology comparison examines the shapes the weight-bearing areas of a foot make in its impression to try to determine whether a suspect can be excluded as the person who made a crime scene impression or included as someone who could have made the impression. In some cases, an examiner is asked to compare a suspect's barefoot impression with an impression left by a foot on the insole of a shoe. Because of the constriction of the foot caused by the shoe, the comparison is not as straightforward, and the approach to the comparison must be suitably conservative. In this paper, we provide the results of a series of experiments designed to provide some validation for this type of examination. Inked impressions were compared to inked impressions, shoe insoles were compared to shoe insoles, and, most importantly, inked impressions were compared to shoe insoles. The "like versus like" comparison results (undertaken with known inked impressions or known shoe insole impressions) were evaluated against comparisons of inked impressions with corresponding insole impressions. The like versus like comparisons demonstrated better correspondences, and the comparison of inked impressions with shoe insoles demonstrated that the closest correspondence was for impressions made by the same person as opposed to impressions made by different people.

AB - Barefoot morphology comparison examines the shapes the weight-bearing areas of a foot make in its impression to try to determine whether a suspect can be excluded as the person who made a crime scene impression or included as someone who could have made the impression. In some cases, an examiner is asked to compare a suspect's barefoot impression with an impression left by a foot on the insole of a shoe. Because of the constriction of the foot caused by the shoe, the comparison is not as straightforward, and the approach to the comparison must be suitably conservative. In this paper, we provide the results of a series of experiments designed to provide some validation for this type of examination. Inked impressions were compared to inked impressions, shoe insoles were compared to shoe insoles, and, most importantly, inked impressions were compared to shoe insoles. The "like versus like" comparison results (undertaken with known inked impressions or known shoe insole impressions) were evaluated against comparisons of inked impressions with corresponding insole impressions. The like versus like comparisons demonstrated better correspondences, and the comparison of inked impressions with shoe insoles demonstrated that the closest correspondence was for impressions made by the same person as opposed to impressions made by different people.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871509648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 603

EP - 622

JO - Journal of Forensic Identification

JF - Journal of Forensic Identification

SN - 0895-173X

IS - 6

ER -