TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiotherapy skin care
T2 - a survey of practice in the UK
AU - Harris, Rachel
AU - Probst, Heidi
AU - Beardmore, Charlotte
AU - James, Sarah
AU - Dumbleton, Claire
AU - Bolderston, Amanda
AU - Faithfull, Sara
AU - Wells, Mary
AU - Southgate, Elizabeth
N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Aim: The primary objective of the survey was to evaluate clinical skin care practice in radiotherapy departments across the United Kingdom. Methods and sample: A questionnaire containing sixty-one questions grouped into eight themed sections was developed and a link to an on-line survey, using the Survey Monkey™ tool, was e-mailed to all radiotherapy department managers in the United Kingdom (N=67). Each recipient was invited to provide one response per department. Key results: Fifty-four departments responded within the allocated timeframe giving a final response rate of 81%. Products and their use for skin conditions varied and some outdated and unfounded practices were still being used which did not always reflect the current evidence base. The amount of data routinely collected on skin toxicity was limited making it difficult to quantify the extent of skin morbidity following radiotherapy. Conclusion: The survey demonstrated variability in skin care practice in radiotherapy departments across the UK, with limited practice based on evidence or on skin toxicity measurement and monitoring.
AB - Aim: The primary objective of the survey was to evaluate clinical skin care practice in radiotherapy departments across the United Kingdom. Methods and sample: A questionnaire containing sixty-one questions grouped into eight themed sections was developed and a link to an on-line survey, using the Survey Monkey™ tool, was e-mailed to all radiotherapy department managers in the United Kingdom (N=67). Each recipient was invited to provide one response per department. Key results: Fifty-four departments responded within the allocated timeframe giving a final response rate of 81%. Products and their use for skin conditions varied and some outdated and unfounded practices were still being used which did not always reflect the current evidence base. The amount of data routinely collected on skin toxicity was limited making it difficult to quantify the extent of skin morbidity following radiotherapy. Conclusion: The survey demonstrated variability in skin care practice in radiotherapy departments across the UK, with limited practice based on evidence or on skin toxicity measurement and monitoring.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855838782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.040
DO - 10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.040
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84855838782
SN - 1078-8174
VL - 18
SP - 21
EP - 27
JO - Radiography
JF - Radiography
IS - 1
ER -