@techreport{d711254c754e4f7aaa7654845660bb03,
title = "Reading and literacy interventions for improving reading and motivation in adolescence: a narrative review",
abstract = "Reading interventions measuring motivational outcomes in adolescence vary in terms of their theoretical frameworks, methodological approaches and findings. However, a review of these is not currently available. Drawing on narrative review principles, this article synthesises academic and grey literature to outline the breadth and scope of interventions which have measured changes in adolescents{\textquoteright} reading motivation and reflects upon those interventions identified. Key characteristics from the existing literature include a strong focus on struggling readers and skills-based goals. Outcomes of reading interventions measuring motivational effects among adolescents are mixed, and often not explicitly grounded in theory. There is also a notable absence of research taking account of the opinions and experiences of adolescents. There is need for much deeper exploration of “what works” for motivating adolescents to read; this should be based in established theory and centre the experiences of adolescents themselves. ",
keywords = "Adolescence, Reading development, Literacy, Motivation, Intervention",
author = "Charlotte Webber and Katherine Wilkinson and Duncan, {Lynne G.} and Sarah McGeown",
note = "CC-By Attribution 4.0 International This work was supported by the ESRC and managed by the SGSSS under Grant ES/P000681/1.",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
day = "18",
doi = "10.31219/osf.io/4mxvt",
language = "English",
publisher = "Open Science Framework (OSF)",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Open Science Framework (OSF)",
}