Abstract
Recent proposals to reform Scottish criminal procedure are motivated by considerations of efficiency and accurate fact-finding, and there is little attempt to offer a normative account. This paper describes these proposals and contends that their emphasis on finding ‘the truth’ is misplaced on two distinct bases: (1) it equates erroneous acquittals to wrongful convictions, thus fails to uphold a fundamental tenet of criminal procedure, namely the particular importance of protecting the innocent against wrongful conviction; and (2) it fails to recognise the importance of non-instrumental process values which are at the heart of the adversarial criminal trial. The paper suggests that it is only by adhering to these process values that the state maintains – and demonstrates that it maintains – its moral authority to condemn and punish offenders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 167-195 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Jan 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Return Directive
- entry ban
- illegal migrant
- criminal law sanctions
- crimmigration
- expulsion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reforming Scottish Criminal Procedure: In Search of Process Values'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver