Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka

Vassilis Pitsinis; John Benson

doi:10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka

Vassilis Pitsinis
, John Benson

Undergraduate Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	4073-4074
Number of pages	2
Journal	Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume	32
Issue number	6
Early online date	21 Mar 2025
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3
Publication status	Published - Jun 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Oncology

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

Cite this

Pitsinis, V., & Benson, J. (2025). Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 32(6), 4073-4074. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

Pitsinis, Vassilis ; Benson, John. / Reply to : Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2025 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 4073-4074.

@article{33cd5f0f110d4be2b080537712ef08f5,

title = "Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to {\textquoteleft}Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial{\textquoteright}, by Kitai and Yamanaka",

author = "Vassilis Pitsinis and John Benson",

year = "2025",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "4073--4074",

journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",

issn = "1068-9265",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

number = "6",

}

Pitsinis, V & Benson, J 2025, 'Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka', Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 4073-4074. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka. / Pitsinis, Vassilis; Benson, John.
In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 32, No. 6, 06.2025, p. 4073-4074.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to

T2 - Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka

AU - Pitsinis, Vassilis

AU - Benson, John

PY - 2025/6

Y1 - 2025/6

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000554652

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

DO - 10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

M3 - Letter

C2 - 40117012

AN - SCOPUS:105000554652

SN - 1068-9265

VL - 32

SP - 4073

EP - 4074

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

IS - 6

ER -

Pitsinis V, Benson J. Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2025 Jun;32(6):4073-4074. Epub 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17158-3

Reply to: Letter to the Editor in Relation to ‘Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial’, by Kitai and Yamanaka

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this