Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A Bayesian analysis

Blair Saunders (Lead / Corresponding author), Marina Milyavskaya, Alexander Etz, Daniel Randles, Michael Inzlicht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
126 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Self-control is assessed using a remarkable array of measures. In a series of five data-sets (overall N = 2,641) and a mini meta-analysis, we explored the association between canonical operationalisations of self-control: The Self-Control Scale and two measures of inhibition related executive functioning (the Stroop and Flanker paradigms). Overall, Bayesian correlational analyses suggested little-to-no relationship between self-reported self-control and performance on the Stroop and Flanker tasks. The Bayesian meta-analytical summary of all five data-sets further favoured a null relationship between both types of measurement. These results suggest that the field’s most widely used measure of self-reported self-control is uncorrelated with two of the most widely adopted executive functioning measures of self-control. Consequently, theoretical and practical conclusions drawn using one measure (e.g., the Self-Control Scale) cannot be generalised to findings using the other (e.g., the Stroop task). The lack of empirical correlation between measures of self-control do not invalidate either measure, but instead suggest that treatments of the construct of self-control need to pay greater attention to convergent validity among the many measures used to operationalize self-control.
Original languageEnglish
Article number39
Number of pages16
JournalCollabra: Psychology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Executive Function
Self-Control
Inhibition (Psychology)
Stroop Test
Meta-Analysis

Keywords

  • self-control
  • cognitive control
  • inhibitory executive functioning
  • Bayesian statistics

Cite this

Saunders, Blair ; Milyavskaya, Marina ; Etz, Alexander ; Randles, Daniel ; Inzlicht, Michael. / Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function : A Bayesian analysis. In: Collabra: Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{e00d79303f5940d89ef97e063cc73c11,
title = "Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A Bayesian analysis",
abstract = "Self-control is assessed using a remarkable array of measures. In a series of five data-sets (overall N = 2,641) and a mini meta-analysis, we explored the association between canonical operationalisations of self-control: The Self-Control Scale and two measures of inhibition related executive functioning (the Stroop and Flanker paradigms). Overall, Bayesian correlational analyses suggested little-to-no relationship between self-reported self-control and performance on the Stroop and Flanker tasks. The Bayesian meta-analytical summary of all five data-sets further favoured a null relationship between both types of measurement. These results suggest that the field’s most widely used measure of self-reported self-control is uncorrelated with two of the most widely adopted executive functioning measures of self-control. Consequently, theoretical and practical conclusions drawn using one measure (e.g., the Self-Control Scale) cannot be generalised to findings using the other (e.g., the Stroop task). The lack of empirical correlation between measures of self-control do not invalidate either measure, but instead suggest that treatments of the construct of self-control need to pay greater attention to convergent validity among the many measures used to operationalize self-control.",
keywords = "self-control, cognitive control, inhibitory executive functioning, Bayesian statistics",
author = "Blair Saunders and Marina Milyavskaya and Alexander Etz and Daniel Randles and Michael Inzlicht",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1525/collabra.134",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Collabra: Psychology",
issn = "2474-7394",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function : A Bayesian analysis. / Saunders, Blair (Lead / Corresponding author); Milyavskaya, Marina; Etz, Alexander; Randles, Daniel; Inzlicht, Michael.

In: Collabra: Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 39, 20.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function

T2 - A Bayesian analysis

AU - Saunders, Blair

AU - Milyavskaya, Marina

AU - Etz, Alexander

AU - Randles, Daniel

AU - Inzlicht, Michael

PY - 2018/11/20

Y1 - 2018/11/20

N2 - Self-control is assessed using a remarkable array of measures. In a series of five data-sets (overall N = 2,641) and a mini meta-analysis, we explored the association between canonical operationalisations of self-control: The Self-Control Scale and two measures of inhibition related executive functioning (the Stroop and Flanker paradigms). Overall, Bayesian correlational analyses suggested little-to-no relationship between self-reported self-control and performance on the Stroop and Flanker tasks. The Bayesian meta-analytical summary of all five data-sets further favoured a null relationship between both types of measurement. These results suggest that the field’s most widely used measure of self-reported self-control is uncorrelated with two of the most widely adopted executive functioning measures of self-control. Consequently, theoretical and practical conclusions drawn using one measure (e.g., the Self-Control Scale) cannot be generalised to findings using the other (e.g., the Stroop task). The lack of empirical correlation between measures of self-control do not invalidate either measure, but instead suggest that treatments of the construct of self-control need to pay greater attention to convergent validity among the many measures used to operationalize self-control.

AB - Self-control is assessed using a remarkable array of measures. In a series of five data-sets (overall N = 2,641) and a mini meta-analysis, we explored the association between canonical operationalisations of self-control: The Self-Control Scale and two measures of inhibition related executive functioning (the Stroop and Flanker paradigms). Overall, Bayesian correlational analyses suggested little-to-no relationship between self-reported self-control and performance on the Stroop and Flanker tasks. The Bayesian meta-analytical summary of all five data-sets further favoured a null relationship between both types of measurement. These results suggest that the field’s most widely used measure of self-reported self-control is uncorrelated with two of the most widely adopted executive functioning measures of self-control. Consequently, theoretical and practical conclusions drawn using one measure (e.g., the Self-Control Scale) cannot be generalised to findings using the other (e.g., the Stroop task). The lack of empirical correlation between measures of self-control do not invalidate either measure, but instead suggest that treatments of the construct of self-control need to pay greater attention to convergent validity among the many measures used to operationalize self-control.

KW - self-control

KW - cognitive control

KW - inhibitory executive functioning

KW - Bayesian statistics

U2 - 10.1525/collabra.134

DO - 10.1525/collabra.134

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Collabra: Psychology

JF - Collabra: Psychology

SN - 2474-7394

IS - 1

M1 - 39

ER -