Reproducibility of Subtraction Radiography in Monitoring Changes in Approximal Carious Lesions in Children: An In Vivo Study

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of Subtraction Radiography in Monitoring Changes in Approximal Carious Lesions in Children

T2 - An In Vivo Study

AU - Al-Sane, Mona

AU - Ricketts, David N.

AU - Mendes, Fausto M.

AU - Altarakemah, Yacoub

AU - Deery, Christopher

AU - Innes, Nicola

AU - Rollings, Sam

N1 - No funding. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - Background: Laboratory studies have shown that digital subtraction radiography (DSR) can be a more effective tool, than conventional radiography, in monitoring changes in carious lesions. The clinical performance of the technique, however, has not been sufficiently researched. Aim: To compare the reproducibility of DSR to that of bitewing radiographs, in monitoring changes in approximal caries in the mixed dentition. A secondary aim was to determine whether assessment outcomes differed as a function of the method used. Design: Six assessors evaluated 310 lesions first on bitewings, then with DSR. The overall reproducibility was evaluated via intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility were assessed using weighted Kappa. Paired t test was used to assess differences in the reproducibility across methods. Results: The overall reproducibility for DSR was (ICC = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56). Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility were 0.65 and 0.44, respectively. The overall reproducibility for bitewings was ICC = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.42-0.57. Intra- and Inter-rater reproducibility were 0.71 and 0.46, respectively. Differences in the reproducibility across methods were not statistically significant. Significantly more lesions were scored as progressed using DSR. Conclusions: The reproducibility of DSR in monitoring changes in approximal caries is comparable to that of bitewings. Additionally, DSR detected higher proportion of progression than bitewing assessments.

AB - Background: Laboratory studies have shown that digital subtraction radiography (DSR) can be a more effective tool, than conventional radiography, in monitoring changes in carious lesions. The clinical performance of the technique, however, has not been sufficiently researched. Aim: To compare the reproducibility of DSR to that of bitewing radiographs, in monitoring changes in approximal caries in the mixed dentition. A secondary aim was to determine whether assessment outcomes differed as a function of the method used. Design: Six assessors evaluated 310 lesions first on bitewings, then with DSR. The overall reproducibility was evaluated via intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility were assessed using weighted Kappa. Paired t test was used to assess differences in the reproducibility across methods. Results: The overall reproducibility for DSR was (ICC = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56). Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility were 0.65 and 0.44, respectively. The overall reproducibility for bitewings was ICC = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.42-0.57. Intra- and Inter-rater reproducibility were 0.71 and 0.46, respectively. Differences in the reproducibility across methods were not statistically significant. Significantly more lesions were scored as progressed using DSR. Conclusions: The reproducibility of DSR in monitoring changes in approximal caries is comparable to that of bitewings. Additionally, DSR detected higher proportion of progression than bitewing assessments.

KW - caries

KW - caries progression

KW - proximal caries

KW - reproducibility

KW - subtraction radiography

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85083067118

U2 - 10.1111/ipd.12638

DO - 10.1111/ipd.12638

M3 - Article

C2 - 32181942

SN - 0960-7439

VL - 30

SP - 587

EP - 596

JO - International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

JF - International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

IS - 5

ER -