Research into employee trust: epistemological foundations and paradigmatic boundaries

Sabina Siebert (Lead / Corresponding author), Graeme Martin, Branko Bozic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the epistemological roots and paradigmatic boundaries of research into employee trust, a growing field in human resource management. Drawing on Burrell and Morgan's well-known sociological paradigms and their epistemological foundations, we identify the dominant approaches to employee trust research to examine its strengths and limitations. Our review of the literature on employee trust revealed that the majority of the most cited papers were written from a psychological perspective, characterised by positivistic methodologies, variance theory explanations and quantitative data collection methods. We also found that most of the studies can be located in the functionalist paradigm, and while accepting that functionalism and psychological positivism have their merits, we argue that research in these traditions sometimes constrains our understanding of employee trust in their organisations. We conclude that trust researchers would benefit from a better understanding of the ontological, epistemological and axiological assumptions underlying of HRM research and should embrace greater epistemic reflexivity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-284
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Resource Management Journal
Volume26
Issue number3
Early online date26 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Employees
Paradigm
Psychological
Reflexivity
Methodology
Data collection
Positivism
Human resource management
Functionalism

Keywords

  • industrial sociology
  • employee trust
  • intra-organisational trust
  • reflexivity
  • sociological paradigms

Cite this

@article{10b46bd988a649ebaad19ffc0a60ab5b,
title = "Research into employee trust: epistemological foundations and paradigmatic boundaries",
abstract = "This article explores the epistemological roots and paradigmatic boundaries of research into employee trust, a growing field in human resource management. Drawing on Burrell and Morgan's well-known sociological paradigms and their epistemological foundations, we identify the dominant approaches to employee trust research to examine its strengths and limitations. Our review of the literature on employee trust revealed that the majority of the most cited papers were written from a psychological perspective, characterised by positivistic methodologies, variance theory explanations and quantitative data collection methods. We also found that most of the studies can be located in the functionalist paradigm, and while accepting that functionalism and psychological positivism have their merits, we argue that research in these traditions sometimes constrains our understanding of employee trust in their organisations. We conclude that trust researchers would benefit from a better understanding of the ontological, epistemological and axiological assumptions underlying of HRM research and should embrace greater epistemic reflexivity.",
keywords = "industrial sociology, employee trust , intra-organisational trust , reflexivity, sociological paradigms",
author = "Sabina Siebert and Graeme Martin and Branko Bozic",
note = "no funding",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1111/1748-8583.12103",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "269--284",
journal = "Human Resource Management Journal",
issn = "0954-5395",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Research into employee trust : epistemological foundations and paradigmatic boundaries. / Siebert, Sabina (Lead / Corresponding author); Martin, Graeme; Bozic, Branko.

In: Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, 05.07.2016, p. 269-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research into employee trust

T2 - epistemological foundations and paradigmatic boundaries

AU - Siebert, Sabina

AU - Martin, Graeme

AU - Bozic, Branko

N1 - no funding

PY - 2016/7/5

Y1 - 2016/7/5

N2 - This article explores the epistemological roots and paradigmatic boundaries of research into employee trust, a growing field in human resource management. Drawing on Burrell and Morgan's well-known sociological paradigms and their epistemological foundations, we identify the dominant approaches to employee trust research to examine its strengths and limitations. Our review of the literature on employee trust revealed that the majority of the most cited papers were written from a psychological perspective, characterised by positivistic methodologies, variance theory explanations and quantitative data collection methods. We also found that most of the studies can be located in the functionalist paradigm, and while accepting that functionalism and psychological positivism have their merits, we argue that research in these traditions sometimes constrains our understanding of employee trust in their organisations. We conclude that trust researchers would benefit from a better understanding of the ontological, epistemological and axiological assumptions underlying of HRM research and should embrace greater epistemic reflexivity.

AB - This article explores the epistemological roots and paradigmatic boundaries of research into employee trust, a growing field in human resource management. Drawing on Burrell and Morgan's well-known sociological paradigms and their epistemological foundations, we identify the dominant approaches to employee trust research to examine its strengths and limitations. Our review of the literature on employee trust revealed that the majority of the most cited papers were written from a psychological perspective, characterised by positivistic methodologies, variance theory explanations and quantitative data collection methods. We also found that most of the studies can be located in the functionalist paradigm, and while accepting that functionalism and psychological positivism have their merits, we argue that research in these traditions sometimes constrains our understanding of employee trust in their organisations. We conclude that trust researchers would benefit from a better understanding of the ontological, epistemological and axiological assumptions underlying of HRM research and should embrace greater epistemic reflexivity.

KW - industrial sociology

KW - employee trust

KW - intra-organisational trust

KW - reflexivity

KW - sociological paradigms

U2 - 10.1111/1748-8583.12103

DO - 10.1111/1748-8583.12103

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 269

EP - 284

JO - Human Resource Management Journal

JF - Human Resource Management Journal

SN - 0954-5395

IS - 3

ER -