Abstract
Tide gauge data have become increasing accessible to non-specialists through the availability of records over the Internet. Our original paper, "Use of local tidal records to identify relative sea level change: accuracy and error for decision makers", focused on highlighting the potential pitfalls in tide gauge data manipulation that non-specialists may not be aware of. Since publication, Rickards et al. have made helpful observations and raised queries about certain elements within our paper, which we respond to here.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 695-696 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Coastal Conservation |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to "Comment on 'Use of local tidal records to identify relative sea level change: accuracy and error for decision makers' by Powell VA, McGlashan DJ, Duck RW (2012) J Coast Conserv" by Rickards L, Brown J, Hibbert A, Woodworth P, Plater AJ (2013) J Coast Conserv'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver