Responsibility in action: expressions of values in a Swedish company

Gudrun Baldvinsdottir (Lead / Corresponding author), Inga-Lill Johansson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose – To illustrate and discuss how different types of responsibility values are mobilised in a Swedish international company. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is informed by a constructivist pragmatism framework. The part of the study related to the case site was inspired by an ethnographic research approach and involved intensive face-to-face observations over a period of two years. Data was collected at four main levels: external and internal documents, observation of project meetings, interviews with project members, and informal talks with organisation members. Findings – Possible conflicts of interest between human and business perspectives are exposed. Awareness of these interest-conflicts, however, facilitates a potential bridging of the two perspectives. Our findings suggest possible explanations as to why management control (MC) models work in practice. Although values pertaining to shareholder maximisation are given prominence in external communication, the internal MC model also emphasises the values considered necessary and desirable by professionals, such as confidence, commitment and respect. The study reveals that the way values are handled affects the responsibility taken by employees in everyday situations. By using the constructivist pragmatism framework, it becomes clear that values cause people to act, and not MC systems. Originality/value – Although many studies have described the shortcoming of MC models, few studies platform from the concept of responsibility. In this paper it is shown how accounting communicates values underpinning responsibility, and contributes towards explaining why certain types of MC models can be more successful than others.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)112-125
    Number of pages14
    JournalQualitative Research in Accounting & Management
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    Responsibility
    Management control
    Pragmatism
    Conflict of interest
    Shareholders
    Management control systems
    Communication
    Confidence
    Design methodology
    Employees

    Cite this

    Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun ; Johansson, Inga-Lill. / Responsibility in action: expressions of values in a Swedish company. In: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 2006 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 112-125.
    @article{f365588313b941139cef1cef4dd28cb9,
    title = "Responsibility in action: expressions of values in a Swedish company",
    abstract = "Purpose – To illustrate and discuss how different types of responsibility values are mobilised in a Swedish international company. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is informed by a constructivist pragmatism framework. The part of the study related to the case site was inspired by an ethnographic research approach and involved intensive face-to-face observations over a period of two years. Data was collected at four main levels: external and internal documents, observation of project meetings, interviews with project members, and informal talks with organisation members. Findings – Possible conflicts of interest between human and business perspectives are exposed. Awareness of these interest-conflicts, however, facilitates a potential bridging of the two perspectives. Our findings suggest possible explanations as to why management control (MC) models work in practice. Although values pertaining to shareholder maximisation are given prominence in external communication, the internal MC model also emphasises the values considered necessary and desirable by professionals, such as confidence, commitment and respect. The study reveals that the way values are handled affects the responsibility taken by employees in everyday situations. By using the constructivist pragmatism framework, it becomes clear that values cause people to act, and not MC systems. Originality/value – Although many studies have described the shortcoming of MC models, few studies platform from the concept of responsibility. In this paper it is shown how accounting communicates values underpinning responsibility, and contributes towards explaining why certain types of MC models can be more successful than others.",
    author = "Gudrun Baldvinsdottir and Inga-Lill Johansson",
    note = "The authors thank the Swedish Research Council and the Jan Wallanders and Tom Hedelius foundation for funding this project. dc.publisher: Emerald Group Publishing",
    year = "2006",
    doi = "10.1108/11766090610670659",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "112--125",
    journal = "Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management",
    issn = "1176-6093",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "2",

    }

    Responsibility in action: expressions of values in a Swedish company. / Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun (Lead / Corresponding author); Johansson, Inga-Lill.

    In: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, p. 112-125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Responsibility in action: expressions of values in a Swedish company

    AU - Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun

    AU - Johansson, Inga-Lill

    N1 - The authors thank the Swedish Research Council and the Jan Wallanders and Tom Hedelius foundation for funding this project. dc.publisher: Emerald Group Publishing

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - Purpose – To illustrate and discuss how different types of responsibility values are mobilised in a Swedish international company. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is informed by a constructivist pragmatism framework. The part of the study related to the case site was inspired by an ethnographic research approach and involved intensive face-to-face observations over a period of two years. Data was collected at four main levels: external and internal documents, observation of project meetings, interviews with project members, and informal talks with organisation members. Findings – Possible conflicts of interest between human and business perspectives are exposed. Awareness of these interest-conflicts, however, facilitates a potential bridging of the two perspectives. Our findings suggest possible explanations as to why management control (MC) models work in practice. Although values pertaining to shareholder maximisation are given prominence in external communication, the internal MC model also emphasises the values considered necessary and desirable by professionals, such as confidence, commitment and respect. The study reveals that the way values are handled affects the responsibility taken by employees in everyday situations. By using the constructivist pragmatism framework, it becomes clear that values cause people to act, and not MC systems. Originality/value – Although many studies have described the shortcoming of MC models, few studies platform from the concept of responsibility. In this paper it is shown how accounting communicates values underpinning responsibility, and contributes towards explaining why certain types of MC models can be more successful than others.

    AB - Purpose – To illustrate and discuss how different types of responsibility values are mobilised in a Swedish international company. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is informed by a constructivist pragmatism framework. The part of the study related to the case site was inspired by an ethnographic research approach and involved intensive face-to-face observations over a period of two years. Data was collected at four main levels: external and internal documents, observation of project meetings, interviews with project members, and informal talks with organisation members. Findings – Possible conflicts of interest between human and business perspectives are exposed. Awareness of these interest-conflicts, however, facilitates a potential bridging of the two perspectives. Our findings suggest possible explanations as to why management control (MC) models work in practice. Although values pertaining to shareholder maximisation are given prominence in external communication, the internal MC model also emphasises the values considered necessary and desirable by professionals, such as confidence, commitment and respect. The study reveals that the way values are handled affects the responsibility taken by employees in everyday situations. By using the constructivist pragmatism framework, it becomes clear that values cause people to act, and not MC systems. Originality/value – Although many studies have described the shortcoming of MC models, few studies platform from the concept of responsibility. In this paper it is shown how accounting communicates values underpinning responsibility, and contributes towards explaining why certain types of MC models can be more successful than others.

    U2 - 10.1108/11766090610670659

    DO - 10.1108/11766090610670659

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    SP - 112

    EP - 125

    JO - Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

    JF - Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

    SN - 1176-6093

    IS - 2

    ER -