Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature

B. L. Chadwick, D. J. P. Evans

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    56 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aim: To review the literature concerning the restoration of primary teeth with glass ionomer (GIC) or resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGI) used in conventional class II cavities. Methods: A search of the literature identified through Medline between 1966 and 2006 using the key words: glass ionomer, resin modified, glass polyalkenoate, deciduous/ primary teeth. Studies that used ART or tunnel preparations were excluded. Papers of relevant clinical studies (prospective and retrospective) were assessed and graded using predetermined criteria. Papers were graded according to the number of criteria met as (A >90%, B1=75%, B2=50%, C<50%). Results: The search identified 411 papers, from which an application of the inclusion criteria yielded 20 studies. Of these, 2 were rated B1 and 18 B2. Failure rates varied from 6.6% to 60% for GIC, and from 2% to 24% for RMGI. Conclusion: GIC cannot be recommended for class II cavities in primary molars. There is evidence that RMGIC can perform successfully in small to moderate sized class II restorations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)14-21
    Number of pages8
    JournalEuropean Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • Glass ionomer cements
    • Restorations
    • Primary teeth

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this