TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of a national multicenter audit assessment of gynecologic history in surgical patients
AU - Wilson, Michael S. J.
AU - Powell-Bowns, Matilda
AU - Robertson, Andrew G.
AU - Luhmann, Andreas
AU - Richards, Colin H.
AU - Scottish Surgical Research Group
N1 - Copyright © 1999-2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Objective: To determine the adequacy of assessing gynecologic history for females of reproductive age (FRA) admitted to a general surgery department.Methods: The present prospective multicenter audit included FRA who were admitted for elective or emergency procedures to general surgery departments in Scotland between May 11 and May 25, 2015. Data were compared between patients who were admitted for elective and emergency treatment.Results: There were 530 FRA included from 18 centers, including 169 (31.9%) and 361 (68.1%) elective and emergency admissions, respectively. The date of last menstrual period was document for 203 (38.3%) patients, use of contraception for 149 (28.1%), sexual activity for 83 (15.7%), pregnancy status for 274 (51.7%), and the possibility of pregnancy for 237 (44.7%). A higher incidence of documented date of last menstrual period (P=0.002) and pregnancy status (P<0.001) were identified among emergency admissions, and the possibility of pregnancy was documented more commonly among elective admissions (P<0.001).Conclusions: Key factors required for gynecologic assessment were often not documented for FRA admitted to general surgery both as elective and emergency admissions. Surgical teams and medical undergraduates require educating regarding the importance of obtaining gynecologic history for all FRA.
AB - Objective: To determine the adequacy of assessing gynecologic history for females of reproductive age (FRA) admitted to a general surgery department.Methods: The present prospective multicenter audit included FRA who were admitted for elective or emergency procedures to general surgery departments in Scotland between May 11 and May 25, 2015. Data were compared between patients who were admitted for elective and emergency treatment.Results: There were 530 FRA included from 18 centers, including 169 (31.9%) and 361 (68.1%) elective and emergency admissions, respectively. The date of last menstrual period was document for 203 (38.3%) patients, use of contraception for 149 (28.1%), sexual activity for 83 (15.7%), pregnancy status for 274 (51.7%), and the possibility of pregnancy for 237 (44.7%). A higher incidence of documented date of last menstrual period (P=0.002) and pregnancy status (P<0.001) were identified among emergency admissions, and the possibility of pregnancy was documented more commonly among elective admissions (P<0.001).Conclusions: Key factors required for gynecologic assessment were often not documented for FRA admitted to general surgery both as elective and emergency admissions. Surgical teams and medical undergraduates require educating regarding the importance of obtaining gynecologic history for all FRA.
KW - Females of reproductive age
KW - Gynecological history
KW - Pregnancy status
U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.12296
DO - 10.1002/ijgo.12296
M3 - Article
C2 - 28799272
SN - 0020-7292
VL - 139
SP - 197
EP - 201
JO - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
IS - 2
ER -