Review: Automatic particle detection in electron microscopy

William V. Nicholson, Robert M. Glaeser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advances in cryoEM and single-particle reconstruction have led to results at increasingly high resolutions. However, to sustain continuing improvements in resolution it will be necessary to increase the number of particles included in performing the reconstructions. Manual selection of particles, even when assisted by computer preselection, is a bottleneck that will become significant as single-particle reconstructions are scaled up to achieve near-atomic resolutions. This review describes various approaches that have been developed to address the problem of automatic particle selection. The principal conclusions that have been drawn from the results so far are: (1) cross-correlation with a reference image (“matched filtering”) is an effective way to identify candidate particles, but it is inherently unable to avoid also selecting false particles; (2) false positives can be eliminated efficiently on the basis of estimates of particle size, density, and texture; (3) successful application of edge detection (or contouring) to particle identification may require improvements over currently available methods; and (4) neural network techniques, while computationally expensive, must also be investigated as a technology for eliminating false particles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-101
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Structural Biology
Volume133
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Particle Size
Electron Microscopy
Technology

Keywords

  • electron microscopy
  • Image processing
  • single-particle reconstruction
  • Object detection
  • pattern recognition

Cite this

@article{04b0405beb8741feac2f3f4c8966e17c,
title = "Review: Automatic particle detection in electron microscopy",
abstract = "Advances in cryoEM and single-particle reconstruction have led to results at increasingly high resolutions. However, to sustain continuing improvements in resolution it will be necessary to increase the number of particles included in performing the reconstructions. Manual selection of particles, even when assisted by computer preselection, is a bottleneck that will become significant as single-particle reconstructions are scaled up to achieve near-atomic resolutions. This review describes various approaches that have been developed to address the problem of automatic particle selection. The principal conclusions that have been drawn from the results so far are: (1) cross-correlation with a reference image (“matched filtering”) is an effective way to identify candidate particles, but it is inherently unable to avoid also selecting false particles; (2) false positives can be eliminated efficiently on the basis of estimates of particle size, density, and texture; (3) successful application of edge detection (or contouring) to particle identification may require improvements over currently available methods; and (4) neural network techniques, while computationally expensive, must also be investigated as a technology for eliminating false particles.",
keywords = "electron microscopy, Image processing, single-particle reconstruction, Object detection, pattern recognition",
author = "Nicholson, {William V.} and Glaeser, {Robert M.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1006/jsbi.2001.4348",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "90--101",
journal = "Journal of Structural Biology",
issn = "1047-8477",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

Review: Automatic particle detection in electron microscopy. / Nicholson, William V.; Glaeser, Robert M.

In: Journal of Structural Biology, Vol. 133, No. 2-3, 2001, p. 90-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review: Automatic particle detection in electron microscopy

AU - Nicholson, William V.

AU - Glaeser, Robert M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Advances in cryoEM and single-particle reconstruction have led to results at increasingly high resolutions. However, to sustain continuing improvements in resolution it will be necessary to increase the number of particles included in performing the reconstructions. Manual selection of particles, even when assisted by computer preselection, is a bottleneck that will become significant as single-particle reconstructions are scaled up to achieve near-atomic resolutions. This review describes various approaches that have been developed to address the problem of automatic particle selection. The principal conclusions that have been drawn from the results so far are: (1) cross-correlation with a reference image (“matched filtering”) is an effective way to identify candidate particles, but it is inherently unable to avoid also selecting false particles; (2) false positives can be eliminated efficiently on the basis of estimates of particle size, density, and texture; (3) successful application of edge detection (or contouring) to particle identification may require improvements over currently available methods; and (4) neural network techniques, while computationally expensive, must also be investigated as a technology for eliminating false particles.

AB - Advances in cryoEM and single-particle reconstruction have led to results at increasingly high resolutions. However, to sustain continuing improvements in resolution it will be necessary to increase the number of particles included in performing the reconstructions. Manual selection of particles, even when assisted by computer preselection, is a bottleneck that will become significant as single-particle reconstructions are scaled up to achieve near-atomic resolutions. This review describes various approaches that have been developed to address the problem of automatic particle selection. The principal conclusions that have been drawn from the results so far are: (1) cross-correlation with a reference image (“matched filtering”) is an effective way to identify candidate particles, but it is inherently unable to avoid also selecting false particles; (2) false positives can be eliminated efficiently on the basis of estimates of particle size, density, and texture; (3) successful application of edge detection (or contouring) to particle identification may require improvements over currently available methods; and (4) neural network techniques, while computationally expensive, must also be investigated as a technology for eliminating false particles.

KW - electron microscopy

KW - Image processing

KW - single-particle reconstruction

KW - Object detection

KW - pattern recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035783159&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4348

DO - 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4348

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 90

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Structural Biology

JF - Journal of Structural Biology

SN - 1047-8477

IS - 2-3

ER -