Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison

Jacky Visser (Lead / Corresponding author), John Lawrence, Jean Wagemans, Chris Reed

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we present an in-depth comparative analysis of two classifications of argument schemes: Walton's typology and Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe annotation guidelines for each classification and apply these to a corpus of arguments from the 2016 US presidential debates. In so doing, we achieve substantial inter-annotator agreement, and produce what, to the best of our knowledge, are the two largest and most reliably annotated corpora of argument schemes in dialogical argumentation publicly available. In describing the creation and comparison of these corpora, we discuss the strengths of each, with an eye towards both computational modelling and argument mining.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018
EditorsSanjay Modgil, Katarzyna Budzynska, John Lawrence, Katarzyna Budzynska
PublisherIOS Press
Pages313-324
Number of pages12
Volume305
ISBN (Print)9781614999058
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018 - Warsaw, Poland
Duration: 12 Sep 201814 Sep 2018

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume305
ISSN (Print)0922-6389

Conference

Conference7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018
CountryPoland
CityWarsaw
Period12/09/1814/09/18

Keywords

  • Annotation
  • Argument mining
  • Argument schemes
  • Classification
  • Corpus

Cite this

Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Wagemans, J., & Reed, C. (2018). Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, J. Lawrence, & K. Budzynska (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (Vol. 305, pp. 313-324). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313
Visser, Jacky ; Lawrence, John ; Wagemans, Jean ; Reed, Chris. / Revisiting computational models of argument schemes : Classification, annotation, comparison. Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018. editor / Sanjay Modgil ; Katarzyna Budzynska ; John Lawrence ; Katarzyna Budzynska. Vol. 305 IOS Press, 2018. pp. 313-324 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications).
@inproceedings{4b7d334fb6e34b9daa096ca028db1349,
title = "Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison",
abstract = "In this paper, we present an in-depth comparative analysis of two classifications of argument schemes: Walton's typology and Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe annotation guidelines for each classification and apply these to a corpus of arguments from the 2016 US presidential debates. In so doing, we achieve substantial inter-annotator agreement, and produce what, to the best of our knowledge, are the two largest and most reliably annotated corpora of argument schemes in dialogical argumentation publicly available. In describing the creation and comparison of these corpora, we discuss the strengths of each, with an eye towards both computational modelling and argument mining.",
keywords = "Annotation, Argument mining, Argument schemes, Classification, Corpus",
author = "Jacky Visser and John Lawrence and Jean Wagemans and Chris Reed",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781614999058",
volume = "305",
series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "313--324",
editor = "Sanjay Modgil and Katarzyna Budzynska and John Lawrence and Katarzyna Budzynska",
booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Visser, J, Lawrence, J, Wagemans, J & Reed, C 2018, Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison. in S Modgil, K Budzynska, J Lawrence & K Budzynska (eds), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018. vol. 305, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 305, IOS Press, pp. 313-324, 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018, Warsaw, Poland, 12/09/18. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313

Revisiting computational models of argument schemes : Classification, annotation, comparison. / Visser, Jacky (Lead / Corresponding author); Lawrence, John; Wagemans, Jean; Reed, Chris.

Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018. ed. / Sanjay Modgil; Katarzyna Budzynska; John Lawrence; Katarzyna Budzynska. Vol. 305 IOS Press, 2018. p. 313-324 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Revisiting computational models of argument schemes

T2 - Classification, annotation, comparison

AU - Visser, Jacky

AU - Lawrence, John

AU - Wagemans, Jean

AU - Reed, Chris

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this paper, we present an in-depth comparative analysis of two classifications of argument schemes: Walton's typology and Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe annotation guidelines for each classification and apply these to a corpus of arguments from the 2016 US presidential debates. In so doing, we achieve substantial inter-annotator agreement, and produce what, to the best of our knowledge, are the two largest and most reliably annotated corpora of argument schemes in dialogical argumentation publicly available. In describing the creation and comparison of these corpora, we discuss the strengths of each, with an eye towards both computational modelling and argument mining.

AB - In this paper, we present an in-depth comparative analysis of two classifications of argument schemes: Walton's typology and Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe annotation guidelines for each classification and apply these to a corpus of arguments from the 2016 US presidential debates. In so doing, we achieve substantial inter-annotator agreement, and produce what, to the best of our knowledge, are the two largest and most reliably annotated corpora of argument schemes in dialogical argumentation publicly available. In describing the creation and comparison of these corpora, we discuss the strengths of each, with an eye towards both computational modelling and argument mining.

KW - Annotation

KW - Argument mining

KW - Argument schemes

KW - Classification

KW - Corpus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053874070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781614999058

VL - 305

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 313

EP - 324

BT - Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018

A2 - Modgil, Sanjay

A2 - Budzynska, Katarzyna

A2 - Lawrence, John

A2 - Budzynska, Katarzyna

PB - IOS Press

ER -

Visser J, Lawrence J, Wagemans J, Reed C. Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison. In Modgil S, Budzynska K, Lawrence J, Budzynska K, editors, Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018. Vol. 305. IOS Press. 2018. p. 313-324. (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313