Abstract
Four possible strategies for ventilation response to fire in a unidirectional tunnel are compared quantitatively for three traffic conditions (congested, stop-and-go, free-flowing) and three fire sizes (5MW, 30MW, 100MW). The overall risk of each strategy for all nine combinations of traffic and fire are assessed using the Austrian tunnel risk model TuRisMo applied to a representative tunnel that is 3km long and has realistic gradients. It is found that commonly-existing strategies such as maintaining airflow in the original traffic direction are appropriate for free-flowing traffic, but that a zero-flow strategy previously proposed for bidirectional tunnels has strong advantages in the event of congested traffic or stop-and-go traffic.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 17th International Symposium on Aerodynamics, Ventilation and Fire in Tunnels 2017, ISAVFT 2017 |
Place of Publication | United States |
Publisher | BHR Group Limited |
Pages | 457-471 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781510851665 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
Event | 17th International Symposium on Aerodynamics, Ventilation and Fire in Tunnels 2017, ISAVFT 2017 - Lyon, France Duration: 13 Sept 2017 → 15 Sept 2017 |
Conference
Conference | 17th International Symposium on Aerodynamics, Ventilation and Fire in Tunnels 2017, ISAVFT 2017 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | France |
City | Lyon |
Period | 13/09/17 → 15/09/17 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Building and Construction