Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer

  • , Alok Khorana
  • , Gerald Soff
  • , Ajay K. Kakkar
  • , Saroj Vadhan-Raj
  • , Hanno Riess
  • , Ted Wun
  • , Michael Streiff
  • , David Garcia
  • , Howard Liebman
  • , Chandra Belani
  • , Eileen O'Reilly
  • , Jai Patel
  • , Habte Yimer
  • , Peter Wildgoose
  • , Paul Burton
  • , Ujjwala Vijapurkar
  • , Simrati Kaul
  • , John Eikelboom
  • , Robert McBane
  • Gary Lyman, Russell Petty

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND Ambulatory patients receiving systemic cancer therapy are at varying risk for venous thromboembolism. However, the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in these patients is uncertain.

    METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial involving high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer (Khorana score of ≥2, on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of venous thromboembolism), we randomly assigned patients without deep-vein thrombosis at screening to receive rivaroxaban (at a dose of 10 mg) or placebo daily for up to 180 days, with screening every 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of objectively confirmed proximal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deepvein thrombosis in an upper limb or distal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, and death from venous thromboembolism and was assessed up to day 180. In a prespecified supportive analysis involving the same population, the same end point was assessed during the intervention period (first receipt of trial agent to last dose plus 2 days). The primary safety end point was major bleeding.

    RESULTS Of 1080 enrolled patients, 49 (4.5%) had thrombosis at screening and did not undergo randomization. Of the 841 patients who underwent randomization, the primary end point occurred in 25 of 420 patients (6.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 37 of 421 (8.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 1.09; P=0.10) in the period up to day 180. In the prespecified intervention-period analysis, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (2.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 27 (6.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.80). Major bleeding occurred in 8 of 405 patients (2.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 4 of 404 (1.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.59 to 6.49).

    CONCLUSIONS In high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer, treatment with rivaroxaban did not result in a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism or death due to venous thromboembolism in the 180-day trial period. During the intervention period, rivaroxaban led to a substantially lower incidence of such events, with a low incidence of major bleeding.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)720-728
    Number of pages9
    JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
    Volume380
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2019

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this