Rocking-isolated frame structures

Margins of safety against toppling collapse and simplified design approach

F. Gelagoti, R. Kourkoulis, I. Anastasopoulos, G. Gazetas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper aims to explore the limitations associated with the design of "rocking-isolated" frame structures. According to this emerging seismic design concept, instead of over-designing the isolated footings of a frame (as entrenched in current capacity-design principles), the latter are under-designed with the intention to limit the seismic loads transmitted to the superstructure. An idealized 2-storey frame is utilized as an illustrative example, to investigate the key factors affecting foundation design. Nonlinear FE analysis is employed to study the seismic performance of the rocking-isolated frame. After investigating the margins of safety against toppling collapse, a simplified procedure is developed to estimate the minimum acceptable footing width B, without recourse to sophisticated (and time consuming) numerical analyses. It is shown that adequate margins of safety against toppling collapse may be achieved, if the toppling displacement capacity of the frame d (i.e. the maximum horizontal displacement that does not provoke toppling) is sufficiently larger than the seismic demand d. With respect to the capacity, the use of an appropriate "equivalent" rigid-body is suggested, and shown to yield a conservative estimate of d. The demand is estimated on the basis of the displacement spectrum, and the peak spectral displacement SD is proposed as a conservative measure of d. The validity and limitations of such approximation are investigated for a rigid-block on rigid-base, utilizing rigorous analytical solutions from the bibliography; and for the frame structure on nonlinear soil, by conducting comprehensive nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. In all cases examined, the simplified SD approach is shown to yield reasonably conservative estimates.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)87-102
    Number of pages16
    JournalSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
    Volume32
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

    Fingerprint

    toppling
    margin of safety
    safety
    footing
    Seismic design
    Bibliographies
    Nonlinear analysis
    seismic design
    bibliography
    Soils
    history
    soil
    demand

    Cite this

    Gelagoti, F. ; Kourkoulis, R. ; Anastasopoulos, I. ; Gazetas, G. / Rocking-isolated frame structures : Margins of safety against toppling collapse and simplified design approach. In: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 87-102.
    @article{4639c2f5a1e24632875893ebdfa1acf8,
    title = "Rocking-isolated frame structures: Margins of safety against toppling collapse and simplified design approach",
    abstract = "This paper aims to explore the limitations associated with the design of {"}rocking-isolated{"} frame structures. According to this emerging seismic design concept, instead of over-designing the isolated footings of a frame (as entrenched in current capacity-design principles), the latter are under-designed with the intention to limit the seismic loads transmitted to the superstructure. An idealized 2-storey frame is utilized as an illustrative example, to investigate the key factors affecting foundation design. Nonlinear FE analysis is employed to study the seismic performance of the rocking-isolated frame. After investigating the margins of safety against toppling collapse, a simplified procedure is developed to estimate the minimum acceptable footing width B, without recourse to sophisticated (and time consuming) numerical analyses. It is shown that adequate margins of safety against toppling collapse may be achieved, if the toppling displacement capacity of the frame d (i.e. the maximum horizontal displacement that does not provoke toppling) is sufficiently larger than the seismic demand d. With respect to the capacity, the use of an appropriate {"}equivalent{"} rigid-body is suggested, and shown to yield a conservative estimate of d. The demand is estimated on the basis of the displacement spectrum, and the peak spectral displacement SD is proposed as a conservative measure of d. The validity and limitations of such approximation are investigated for a rigid-block on rigid-base, utilizing rigorous analytical solutions from the bibliography; and for the frame structure on nonlinear soil, by conducting comprehensive nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. In all cases examined, the simplified SD approach is shown to yield reasonably conservative estimates.",
    author = "F. Gelagoti and R. Kourkoulis and I. Anastasopoulos and G. Gazetas",
    note = "Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
    year = "2012",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "87--102",
    journal = "Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering",
    issn = "0267-7261",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1",

    }

    Rocking-isolated frame structures : Margins of safety against toppling collapse and simplified design approach. / Gelagoti, F.; Kourkoulis, R.; Anastasopoulos, I.; Gazetas, G.

    In: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 87-102.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rocking-isolated frame structures

    T2 - Margins of safety against toppling collapse and simplified design approach

    AU - Gelagoti, F.

    AU - Kourkoulis, R.

    AU - Anastasopoulos, I.

    AU - Gazetas, G.

    N1 - Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    PY - 2012/1

    Y1 - 2012/1

    N2 - This paper aims to explore the limitations associated with the design of "rocking-isolated" frame structures. According to this emerging seismic design concept, instead of over-designing the isolated footings of a frame (as entrenched in current capacity-design principles), the latter are under-designed with the intention to limit the seismic loads transmitted to the superstructure. An idealized 2-storey frame is utilized as an illustrative example, to investigate the key factors affecting foundation design. Nonlinear FE analysis is employed to study the seismic performance of the rocking-isolated frame. After investigating the margins of safety against toppling collapse, a simplified procedure is developed to estimate the minimum acceptable footing width B, without recourse to sophisticated (and time consuming) numerical analyses. It is shown that adequate margins of safety against toppling collapse may be achieved, if the toppling displacement capacity of the frame d (i.e. the maximum horizontal displacement that does not provoke toppling) is sufficiently larger than the seismic demand d. With respect to the capacity, the use of an appropriate "equivalent" rigid-body is suggested, and shown to yield a conservative estimate of d. The demand is estimated on the basis of the displacement spectrum, and the peak spectral displacement SD is proposed as a conservative measure of d. The validity and limitations of such approximation are investigated for a rigid-block on rigid-base, utilizing rigorous analytical solutions from the bibliography; and for the frame structure on nonlinear soil, by conducting comprehensive nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. In all cases examined, the simplified SD approach is shown to yield reasonably conservative estimates.

    AB - This paper aims to explore the limitations associated with the design of "rocking-isolated" frame structures. According to this emerging seismic design concept, instead of over-designing the isolated footings of a frame (as entrenched in current capacity-design principles), the latter are under-designed with the intention to limit the seismic loads transmitted to the superstructure. An idealized 2-storey frame is utilized as an illustrative example, to investigate the key factors affecting foundation design. Nonlinear FE analysis is employed to study the seismic performance of the rocking-isolated frame. After investigating the margins of safety against toppling collapse, a simplified procedure is developed to estimate the minimum acceptable footing width B, without recourse to sophisticated (and time consuming) numerical analyses. It is shown that adequate margins of safety against toppling collapse may be achieved, if the toppling displacement capacity of the frame d (i.e. the maximum horizontal displacement that does not provoke toppling) is sufficiently larger than the seismic demand d. With respect to the capacity, the use of an appropriate "equivalent" rigid-body is suggested, and shown to yield a conservative estimate of d. The demand is estimated on the basis of the displacement spectrum, and the peak spectral displacement SD is proposed as a conservative measure of d. The validity and limitations of such approximation are investigated for a rigid-block on rigid-base, utilizing rigorous analytical solutions from the bibliography; and for the frame structure on nonlinear soil, by conducting comprehensive nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. In all cases examined, the simplified SD approach is shown to yield reasonably conservative estimates.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455212267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 87

    EP - 102

    JO - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

    JF - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

    SN - 0267-7261

    IS - 1

    ER -