Abstract
Evaluates the proposal to create a harmonised set of choice of law rules in matrimonial assets in the Draft Regulation amending Regulation 2201/2003 (draft Rome III Regulation), including whether: (1) it exceeds the competence of the EC; (2) it is consistent with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; (3) harmonisation of the choice of law rules in divorce is necessary; (4) its premises are clear; (5) its scope is appropriate; and (6) it is likely to lead to harmonised practice with regard to international divorce. Assesses the consequences of the UK's decision not to adopt the draft Regulation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 178-205 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2008 |
Keywords
- Family law
- European Union law
- Conflict of laws
- Choice of law
- Divorce
- Legislative competence