Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a UK population with type 2 diabetes and aged over 70 years: an instrumental variable approach

  • Laura M. Güdemann (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Katie G. Young
  • , Nicholas J.M. Thomas
  • , Rhian Hopkins
  • , Robert Challen
  • , Angus G. Jones
  • , Andrew T. Hattersley
  • , Ewan R. Pearson
  • , Beverley M. Shields
  • , Jack Bowden
  • , John M. Dennis
  • , Andrew P. McGovern
  • , MASTERMIND consortium

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

131 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Older adults are under-represented in trials, meaning the benefits and risks of glucose-lowering agents in this age group are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in people with type 2 diabetes aged over 70 years using causal analysis. 

Methods: Hospital-linked UK primary care data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 2013–2020) were used to compare adverse events and effectiveness in individuals initiating SGLT2i compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i). Analysis was age-stratified: <70 years (SGLT2i n=66,810, DPP4i n=76,172), ≥70 years (SGLT2i n=10,419, DPP4i n=33,434). Outcomes were assessed using the instrumental variable causal inference method and prescriber preference as the instrument. 

Results: Risk of diabetic ketoacidosis was increased with SGLT2i in those aged ≥70 (incidence rate ratio compared with DPP4i: 3.82 [95% CI 1.12, 13.03]), but not in those aged <70 (1.12 [0.41, 3.04]). However, incidence rates with SGLT2i in those ≥70 was low (29.6 [29.5, 29.7]) per 10,000 person-years. SGLT2i were associated with similarly increased risk of genital infection in both age groups (incidence rate ratio in those <70: 2.27 [2.03, 2.53]; ≥70: 2.16 [1.77, 2.63]). There was no evidence of an increased risk of volume depletion, poor micturition control, urinary frequency, falls or amputation with SGLT2i in either age group. In those ≥70, HbA1c reduction was similar between SGLT2i and DPP4i (−0.3 mmol/mol [−1.6, 1.1], −0.02% [0.1, 0.1]), but in those <70, SGLT2i were more effective (−4 mmol/mol [4.8, −3.1], −0.4% [−0.4, −0.3]). 

Conclusions/interpretation: Causal analysis suggests SGLT2i are effective in adults aged ≥70 years, but increase risk for genital infections and diabetic ketoacidosis. Our study extends RCT evidence to older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1817-1827
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetologia
Volume67
Issue number9
Early online date5 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Causal analysis
  • Effectiveness
  • Older adults
  • Safety
  • SGLT2 inhibitors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a UK population with type 2 diabetes and aged over 70 years: an instrumental variable approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this