Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and feasibility of peri-device leakage closure after LAAO: an international, multicentre collaborative study

  • Kerstin Piayda
  • , Kolja Sievert
  • , Domenico G.Della Rocca
  • , Oluwaseun G. Adeola
  • , Mohamad Alkhouli
  • , David Yoo
  • , Tomás Benito-González
  • , Ignacio Cruz González
  • , Roberto Galea
  • , Carsten Skurk
  • , Ole de Backer
  • , Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk
  • , Marek Grygier
  • , Elijah H. Beaty
  • , Jim Newton
  • , Armando Pérez de Prado
  • , Lorenz Räber
  • , Douglas Gibson
  • , Christoffel Van Niekerk
  • , Christopher R. Ellis
  • Rodney P. Horton, Andrea Natale, Iris Grunwald, Tobias Zeus, Horst Sievert

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Residual peri-device leakage (PDL) is frequent after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Little is known about management strategies, procedural aspects and outcomes of interventional PDL closure. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of PDL closure after LAAO. Methods: Fifteen centres contributed data on baseline characteristics, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent PDL closure after LAAO. Outcomes of interest included acute success and complication rates and long-term efficacy of the procedure. Results: A total of 95 patients were included and a cumulative number of 104 leaks were closed. The majority of PDLs were detected within 90 days (range 41-231). Detachable coils were the most frequent approach (42.3%), followed by the use of the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II (29.8%) and the AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II (17.3%). Technical success was 100% with 94.2% of devices placed successfully within the first attempt. There were no major complications requiring surgical or transcatheter interventions. During follow-up (96 days [range 49-526]), persistent leaks were found in 18 patients (18.9%), yielding a functional success rate of 82.7%, although PDLs were significantly reduced in size (pre-leak sizemax: 6.1±3.6 mm vs post-leak sizemax: 2.5±1.3 mm, p<0.001). None of the patients had a leak >5 mm. Major adverse events during follow-up occurred in 5 patients (2 ischaemic strokes, 2 intracranial haemorrhages, and 1 major gastrointestinal bleeding). Conclusions: Several interventional techniques have become available to achieve PDL closure. They are associated with high technical and functional success and low complication rates.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)E1033-E1040
    Number of pages8
    JournalEuroIntervention
    Volume17
    Issue number12
    Early online date16 Dec 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

    Keywords

    • Atrial fibrillation
    • LAA closure
    • Stroke

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and feasibility of peri-device leakage closure after LAAO: an international, multicentre collaborative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this