Scotland and the Supreme Court

Daniel Carr

Scotland and the Supreme Court

Daniel Carr

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Comments on the debates in the Edinburgh University Private Law Forum on September 29, 2003 on the subject of Scotland and the Supreme Court, following the publication of a consultation paper entitled Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom published by the Department for Constitutional Affairs. Reports on the issues which the speakers identified as needing consideration including civil and criminal appeals from Scotland, presence of judges from different jurisdictions and whether there should be UK wide jurisdiction. © 2011 Sweet & Maxwell

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	206-207
Number of pages	2
Journal	SCOLAG Legal Journal
Issue number	313
Publication status	Published - Nov 2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

Administration of justice
Constitutional law
Appeals
Scotland
Supreme Court

Access to Document

http://www.scolag.org/

Cite this

@article{fcc370be15c146019e1635944ee67a12,

title = "Scotland and the Supreme Court",

abstract = "Comments on the debates in the Edinburgh University Private Law Forum on September 29, 2003 on the subject of Scotland and the Supreme Court, following the publication of a consultation paper entitled Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom published by the Department for Constitutional Affairs. Reports on the issues which the speakers identified as needing consideration including civil and criminal appeals from Scotland, presence of judges from different jurisdictions and whether there should be UK wide jurisdiction. {\textcopyright} 2011 Sweet \& Maxwell",

keywords = "Administration of justice, Constitutional law, Appeals, Scotland, Supreme Court",

author = "Daniel Carr",

note = " dc.publisher: Scottish Legal Action Group ",

year = "2003",

month = nov,

language = "English",

pages = "206--207",

journal = "SCOLAG Legal Journal",

issn = "0264-8717",

number = "313",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scotland and the Supreme Court

AU - Carr, Daniel

N1 - dc.publisher: Scottish Legal Action Group

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Comments on the debates in the Edinburgh University Private Law Forum on September 29, 2003 on the subject of Scotland and the Supreme Court, following the publication of a consultation paper entitled Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom published by the Department for Constitutional Affairs. Reports on the issues which the speakers identified as needing consideration including civil and criminal appeals from Scotland, presence of judges from different jurisdictions and whether there should be UK wide jurisdiction. © 2011 Sweet & Maxwell

AB - Comments on the debates in the Edinburgh University Private Law Forum on September 29, 2003 on the subject of Scotland and the Supreme Court, following the publication of a consultation paper entitled Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom published by the Department for Constitutional Affairs. Reports on the issues which the speakers identified as needing consideration including civil and criminal appeals from Scotland, presence of judges from different jurisdictions and whether there should be UK wide jurisdiction. © 2011 Sweet & Maxwell

KW - Administration of justice

KW - Constitutional law

KW - Appeals

KW - Scotland

KW - Supreme Court

M3 - Article

SN - 0264-8717

SP - 206

EP - 207

JO - SCOLAG Legal Journal

JF - SCOLAG Legal Journal

IS - 313

ER -

Scotland and the Supreme Court

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this