Abstract
This past summer saw the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. Windsor, and while the case has generated copious amounts of commentary and scholarship, relatively little attention has been paid to the case’s discussion of bill short titles. Central to the case’s analysis was a dispute over the role of short titles in inferring legislative purpose, and given this dispute, this Remark will argue that it’s time for a Congressional bill naming authority to ensure sensible, descriptive bill names.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 25 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | Yale Law and Policy Review |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 14 Dec 2013 |
Keywords
- Short titles
- Bills
- Laws
- Naming
- Congress
- US Supreme Court
- Windsor
- Legislation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Law