TY - JOUR
T1 - Searching for the sound of premium beer
AU - Almiron-Chamadoira, P.
AU - Barbosa Escoba, F. J.
AU - Pathak, A.
AU - Spence, C.
AU - Velasco, C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Asahi Breweries Ltd. for partially funding this research. Paula Almiron would like to thank AZTI for their support. This paper is contribution n? 996 from AZTI, Food Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA).
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - One common definition of premiumness is as a higher quality and more expensive variant of a product than other members of the category or reference class. Brand premiumness can effectively be conveyed by means of different sensory cues of brand touchpoints (e.g., colours, sounds, weight). However, to date, research linking the sound of a product’s packaging with premiumness is sparse. In the present study, we demonstrate for the first time that consumers associate different levels of beer premiumness with the sounds of opening and pouring of bottles and cans. We report the results of two online experiments. Experiment 1 explored the effect of two sound properties associated with beer can and bottle opening and pouring (sound pressure and frequency) on the perception of premiumness. Experiment 2 used semantic differentials (e.g., good-bad, passive-active) to evaluate the meanings people tend to associate with different auditory cues. The analyses revealed that participants perceived: 1) bottle sounds to be more premium overall than can sounds, 2) pouring sounds as more premium than opening sounds, and 3) higher pressure sounds as more premium than lower pressure sounds. Additionally, premiumness was positively correlated with semantic differentials of dead-alive, and the evaluative terms of sad-happy, awful-nice, and bad-good, which highlights the perceived quality and premium character of a beer when conveyed auditorily.
AB - One common definition of premiumness is as a higher quality and more expensive variant of a product than other members of the category or reference class. Brand premiumness can effectively be conveyed by means of different sensory cues of brand touchpoints (e.g., colours, sounds, weight). However, to date, research linking the sound of a product’s packaging with premiumness is sparse. In the present study, we demonstrate for the first time that consumers associate different levels of beer premiumness with the sounds of opening and pouring of bottles and cans. We report the results of two online experiments. Experiment 1 explored the effect of two sound properties associated with beer can and bottle opening and pouring (sound pressure and frequency) on the perception of premiumness. Experiment 2 used semantic differentials (e.g., good-bad, passive-active) to evaluate the meanings people tend to associate with different auditory cues. The analyses revealed that participants perceived: 1) bottle sounds to be more premium overall than can sounds, 2) pouring sounds as more premium than opening sounds, and 3) higher pressure sounds as more premium than lower pressure sounds. Additionally, premiumness was positively correlated with semantic differentials of dead-alive, and the evaluative terms of sad-happy, awful-nice, and bad-good, which highlights the perceived quality and premium character of a beer when conveyed auditorily.
KW - beer
KW - premium
KW - sound
KW - packaging
KW - multisensory marketing
KW - Packaging
KW - Premium
KW - Sound
KW - Multisensory marketing
KW - Beer
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104088
DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104088
M3 - Article
SN - 0950-3293
VL - 88
JO - Food Quality and Preference
JF - Food Quality and Preference
M1 - 104088
ER -