Abstract
Debates on the ideal age to learn the English language as a second or foreign language continue to permeate the field of applied linguistics. While some research concludes that the earlier a learner is exposed to the target language, the better, others are of the opinion that later access to a second or foreign language might be more advantageous. Employing selected non-native speakers of English as a case study, this research attempts to examine both sides of the argument.
A qualitative research design was employed, using in-depth interview as the data gathering tool, with 4 participants. The findings of the study show that both earlier and later access to a second language tend to have unique benefits and shortcomings. While second language learning should be encouraged to start at earlier ages, adult learning should also be supported and promoted, as the maturity capacity can be advantageous in the learning process if appropriately harnessed.
A qualitative research design was employed, using in-depth interview as the data gathering tool, with 4 participants. The findings of the study show that both earlier and later access to a second language tend to have unique benefits and shortcomings. While second language learning should be encouraged to start at earlier ages, adult learning should also be supported and promoted, as the maturity capacity can be advantageous in the learning process if appropriately harnessed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Social Science Student Research |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 5 Dec 2024 |
Keywords
- Second/foreign language
- applied linguistics
- target language
- non-native speakers
- critical period hypothesis
- reflexive thematic analysis
- Lingua Franca