Securitization outside of the West: conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa

Edwin Ezeokafor (Lead / Corresponding author), Christian Kaunert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Securitization is arguably the most successful theoretical framework to analyse security beyond the military confines with the nation state as the dominant actor within the international system. Amongst the critical voices, securitization has become the gold standard for analysing emerging challenges, such as migration, terrorism, human security, intra-state and cross-border issues, as well as environmental challenges. Yet, despite its broadening agenda, the framework has also been accused of a Western bias with a Western political context and democratic governance structure at its heart. This article aims to re-conceptualize the framework in a way that suits a non-Western context better, notably by re-conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa, which gives us significant new insights into non-Western political contexts. It analyses the securitization processes among the political elites in a neo-patrimonial statehood. It further stretches the conceptualization of securitization into African statehood, characterized by a blurred line between the leader and the state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-99
Number of pages17
JournalGlobal Discourse
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date15 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

patrimonialism
statehood
human security
gold standard
international system
accused
political elite
nation state
terrorism
Military
migration
leader
governance
trend

Keywords

  • audience
  • context
  • neo-patrimonialism
  • Securitization
  • West Africa

Cite this

@article{42ac1001bd5b40ddacbfc66dc54acdc7,
title = "Securitization outside of the West: conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa",
abstract = "Securitization is arguably the most successful theoretical framework to analyse security beyond the military confines with the nation state as the dominant actor within the international system. Amongst the critical voices, securitization has become the gold standard for analysing emerging challenges, such as migration, terrorism, human security, intra-state and cross-border issues, as well as environmental challenges. Yet, despite its broadening agenda, the framework has also been accused of a Western bias with a Western political context and democratic governance structure at its heart. This article aims to re-conceptualize the framework in a way that suits a non-Western context better, notably by re-conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa, which gives us significant new insights into non-Western political contexts. It analyses the securitization processes among the political elites in a neo-patrimonial statehood. It further stretches the conceptualization of securitization into African statehood, characterized by a blurred line between the leader and the state.",
keywords = "audience, context, neo-patrimonialism, Securitization, West Africa",
author = "Edwin Ezeokafor and Christian Kaunert",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/23269995.2017.1412619",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "83--99",
journal = "Global Discourse",
issn = "2326-9995",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Securitization outside of the West : conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa. / Ezeokafor, Edwin (Lead / Corresponding author); Kaunert, Christian.

In: Global Discourse, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2018, p. 83-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Securitization outside of the West

T2 - conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa

AU - Ezeokafor, Edwin

AU - Kaunert, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Securitization is arguably the most successful theoretical framework to analyse security beyond the military confines with the nation state as the dominant actor within the international system. Amongst the critical voices, securitization has become the gold standard for analysing emerging challenges, such as migration, terrorism, human security, intra-state and cross-border issues, as well as environmental challenges. Yet, despite its broadening agenda, the framework has also been accused of a Western bias with a Western political context and democratic governance structure at its heart. This article aims to re-conceptualize the framework in a way that suits a non-Western context better, notably by re-conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa, which gives us significant new insights into non-Western political contexts. It analyses the securitization processes among the political elites in a neo-patrimonial statehood. It further stretches the conceptualization of securitization into African statehood, characterized by a blurred line between the leader and the state.

AB - Securitization is arguably the most successful theoretical framework to analyse security beyond the military confines with the nation state as the dominant actor within the international system. Amongst the critical voices, securitization has become the gold standard for analysing emerging challenges, such as migration, terrorism, human security, intra-state and cross-border issues, as well as environmental challenges. Yet, despite its broadening agenda, the framework has also been accused of a Western bias with a Western political context and democratic governance structure at its heart. This article aims to re-conceptualize the framework in a way that suits a non-Western context better, notably by re-conceptualizing the securitization–neo-patrimonialism nexus in Africa, which gives us significant new insights into non-Western political contexts. It analyses the securitization processes among the political elites in a neo-patrimonial statehood. It further stretches the conceptualization of securitization into African statehood, characterized by a blurred line between the leader and the state.

KW - audience

KW - context

KW - neo-patrimonialism

KW - Securitization

KW - West Africa

U2 - 10.1080/23269995.2017.1412619

DO - 10.1080/23269995.2017.1412619

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042078904

VL - 8

SP - 83

EP - 99

JO - Global Discourse

JF - Global Discourse

SN - 2326-9995

IS - 1

ER -