‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases

Thierry Balzacq (Lead / Corresponding author), Sarah Leonard, Jan Ruzicka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which: (i) the security character of public problems is established; (ii) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed; and (iii) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. Firstly, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. The article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. Firstly, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Secondly, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security - influenced by the speech act - with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasises practices and processes. Thirdly, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related respectively to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-531
Number of pages38
JournalInternational Relations
Volume30
Issue number4
Early online date5 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

speech act
international relations
acceptance
commitment
threat
politics
methodology

Keywords

  • Case studies
  • Methods
  • Securitization
  • Theory
  • Analytics of government

Cite this

Balzacq, Thierry ; Leonard, Sarah ; Ruzicka, Jan. / ‘Securitization’ revisited : theory and cases. In: International Relations. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 494-531.
@article{b3612906a66a4629a858ab3824571aa2,
title = "‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases",
abstract = "Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which: (i) the security character of public problems is established; (ii) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed; and (iii) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. Firstly, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. The article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. Firstly, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Secondly, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security - influenced by the speech act - with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasises practices and processes. Thirdly, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related respectively to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.",
keywords = "Case studies, Methods, Securitization, Theory, Analytics of government",
author = "Thierry Balzacq and Sarah Leonard and Jan Ruzicka",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0047117815596590",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "494--531",
journal = "International Relations",
issn = "0047-1178",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Balzacq, T, Leonard, S & Ruzicka, J 2015, '‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases', International Relations, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 494-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815596590

‘Securitization’ revisited : theory and cases. / Balzacq, Thierry (Lead / Corresponding author); Leonard, Sarah; Ruzicka, Jan.

In: International Relations, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2015, p. 494-531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Securitization’ revisited

T2 - theory and cases

AU - Balzacq, Thierry

AU - Leonard, Sarah

AU - Ruzicka, Jan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which: (i) the security character of public problems is established; (ii) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed; and (iii) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. Firstly, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. The article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. Firstly, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Secondly, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security - influenced by the speech act - with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasises practices and processes. Thirdly, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related respectively to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.

AB - Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which: (i) the security character of public problems is established; (ii) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed; and (iii) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. Firstly, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. The article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. Firstly, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Secondly, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security - influenced by the speech act - with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasises practices and processes. Thirdly, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related respectively to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.

KW - Case studies

KW - Methods

KW - Securitization

KW - Theory

KW - Analytics of government

U2 - 10.1177/0047117815596590

DO - 10.1177/0047117815596590

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 494

EP - 531

JO - International Relations

JF - International Relations

SN - 0047-1178

IS - 4

ER -