Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: an analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric

Steve Reicher, Nick Hopkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    124 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper presents an analysis of an anti-abortionist's speech to a medical audience. It is shown that central to the speech is the way in which the speaker defines the context of the abortion debate and hence the categories of people involved. In particular, the speaker construes himself as a member of a common in-group with his audience, construes the entire audience as part of an anti-abortion category and claims that abortion is in contradict ion with the defining features of the audience's medical identity on a series of levels. This analysis is used to make two suggestions. Firstly, following self-categorization theory, that the ways in which self-categories are defined may be central to the process of mass social influence. Secondly, however, self-categories may not be specified by intra-psychic processes but rather are discursively constructed and argued over. The implications of such a position for future research on self-categorization and category salience are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)297-311
    Number of pages15
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume35
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1996

    Cite this

    @article{4cd78b70a0fe4e3fa8b66469efdc5a59,
    title = "Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: an analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric",
    abstract = "This paper presents an analysis of an anti-abortionist's speech to a medical audience. It is shown that central to the speech is the way in which the speaker defines the context of the abortion debate and hence the categories of people involved. In particular, the speaker construes himself as a member of a common in-group with his audience, construes the entire audience as part of an anti-abortion category and claims that abortion is in contradict ion with the defining features of the audience's medical identity on a series of levels. This analysis is used to make two suggestions. Firstly, following self-categorization theory, that the ways in which self-categories are defined may be central to the process of mass social influence. Secondly, however, self-categories may not be specified by intra-psychic processes but rather are discursively constructed and argued over. The implications of such a position for future research on self-categorization and category salience are discussed.",
    author = "Steve Reicher and Nick Hopkins",
    year = "1996",
    doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "297--311",
    journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
    issn = "0144-6665",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories : an analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. / Reicher, Steve ; Hopkins, Nick .

    In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1996, p. 297-311.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories

    T2 - an analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric

    AU - Reicher, Steve

    AU - Hopkins, Nick

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - This paper presents an analysis of an anti-abortionist's speech to a medical audience. It is shown that central to the speech is the way in which the speaker defines the context of the abortion debate and hence the categories of people involved. In particular, the speaker construes himself as a member of a common in-group with his audience, construes the entire audience as part of an anti-abortion category and claims that abortion is in contradict ion with the defining features of the audience's medical identity on a series of levels. This analysis is used to make two suggestions. Firstly, following self-categorization theory, that the ways in which self-categories are defined may be central to the process of mass social influence. Secondly, however, self-categories may not be specified by intra-psychic processes but rather are discursively constructed and argued over. The implications of such a position for future research on self-categorization and category salience are discussed.

    AB - This paper presents an analysis of an anti-abortionist's speech to a medical audience. It is shown that central to the speech is the way in which the speaker defines the context of the abortion debate and hence the categories of people involved. In particular, the speaker construes himself as a member of a common in-group with his audience, construes the entire audience as part of an anti-abortion category and claims that abortion is in contradict ion with the defining features of the audience's medical identity on a series of levels. This analysis is used to make two suggestions. Firstly, following self-categorization theory, that the ways in which self-categories are defined may be central to the process of mass social influence. Secondly, however, self-categories may not be specified by intra-psychic processes but rather are discursively constructed and argued over. The implications of such a position for future research on self-categorization and category salience are discussed.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 297

    EP - 311

    JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

    JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

    SN - 0144-6665

    IS - 3

    ER -