Self- and Peer-Assessment: Evidence from the Accounting and Finance Discipline

Omaima A G Hassan, Alison Fox, Gwen Hannah

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Self- and peer-assessment of student work is an area that is under-researched in the accounting education literature, although the subject area of study seems to influence the results obtained in prior studies. The current study contributes to the literature by examining the accuracy and construct validity of self- and peer-assessment by accounting students. It also investigates students' views about these exercises. The findings show that whilst the self- and peer-assessment of students appear to be neither accurate nor valid, the students are positive about the impact of these procedures on their learning experience. These findings indicate that, although instructors might not rely on self- and peer-assessment as measures of students' performance for the purpose of summative assessment, the exercise may prove useful for formative assessment because it can promote a wide range of transferable skills.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)225-243
    Number of pages19
    JournalAccounting Education
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    Early online date17 Jun 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • accuracy
    • peer-assessment
    • Self-assessment
    • students' views
    • validity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Accounting
    • Education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self- and Peer-Assessment: Evidence from the Accounting and Finance Discipline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this