TY - JOUR
T1 - Sigmund Exner's (1887) einige beobachtungen über bewegungsnachbilder (some observations on movement aftereffects)
T2 - an illustrated translation with commentary
AU - Verstraten, Frans A. J.
AU - Niehorster, Diederick C.
AU - van de Grind, Wim A.
AU - Wade, Nicholas J.
N1 - FV was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Australian Research Council (ARC). DN was supported by a PhD fellowship from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council.
PY - 2015/10
Y1 - 2015/10
N2 - In his original contribution, Exner's principal concern was a comparison between the properties of different aftereffects, and particularly to determine whether aftereffects of motion were similar to those of color and whether they could be encompassed within a unified physiological framework. Despite the fact that he was unable to answer his main question, there are some excellent-so far unknown-contributions in Exner's paper. For example, he describes observations that can be related to binocular interaction, not only in motion aftereffects but also in rivalry. To the best of our knowledge, Exner provides the first description of binocular rivalry induced by differently moving patterns in each eye, for motion as well as for their aftereffects. Moreover, apart from several known, but beautifully addressed, phenomena he makes a clear distinction between motion in depth based on stimulus properties and motion in depth based on the interpretation of motion. That is, the experience of movement, as distinct from the perception of movement. The experience, unlike the perception, did not result in a motion aftereffect in depth.
AB - In his original contribution, Exner's principal concern was a comparison between the properties of different aftereffects, and particularly to determine whether aftereffects of motion were similar to those of color and whether they could be encompassed within a unified physiological framework. Despite the fact that he was unable to answer his main question, there are some excellent-so far unknown-contributions in Exner's paper. For example, he describes observations that can be related to binocular interaction, not only in motion aftereffects but also in rivalry. To the best of our knowledge, Exner provides the first description of binocular rivalry induced by differently moving patterns in each eye, for motion as well as for their aftereffects. Moreover, apart from several known, but beautifully addressed, phenomena he makes a clear distinction between motion in depth based on stimulus properties and motion in depth based on the interpretation of motion. That is, the experience of movement, as distinct from the perception of movement. The experience, unlike the perception, did not result in a motion aftereffect in depth.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Aftereffect
KW - Color
KW - Depth
KW - Interocular transfer
KW - Motion
KW - Retinotopy
KW - Rivalry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952655527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2041669515593044
DO - 10.1177/2041669515593044
M3 - Article
C2 - 27648213
AN - SCOPUS:84952655527
SN - 2041-6695
VL - 6
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - I-Perception
JF - I-Perception
IS - 5
ER -