Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools

Andrew Kenneth Tolmie, Keith J. Topping, Donald Christie, Caroline Donaldson, Christine Howe, Emma Jessiman, Kay Livingston, Allen Thurston

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    91 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There is conflicting evidence on whether collaborative group work leads to improved classroom relations, and if so how. A before and after design was used to measure the impact on work and play relations of a collaborative learning programme involving 575 students 9–12 years old in single- and mixed-age classes across urban and rural schools. Data were also collected on student interactions and teacher ratings of their group-work skills. Analysis of variance revealed significant gains for both types of relation. Multilevel modelling indicated that better work relations were the product of improving group skills, which offset tensions produced by transactive dialogue, and this effect fed through in turn to play relations. Although before intervention rural children were familiar with each other neither this nor age mix affected outcomes. The results suggest the social benefits of collaborative learning are a separate outcome of group work, rather than being either a pre-condition for, or a direct consequence of successful activity, but that initial training in group skills may serve to enhance these benefits.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-191
    Number of pages15
    JournalLearning and Instruction
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Group work
    • Collaborative learning
    • Primary school pupils
    • Education

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005