Social movement rhetoric and the social psychology of collective action: a case study of anti-abortion mobilization

Nick Hopkins, Steve Reicher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper seeks to contribute toward an integrated approach to social movement mobilization. It does so through considering how a social psychological account of the determination of collective behavior (self-categorization theory) may be applied to the mobilization rhetoric of social movements. More specifically it argues that as people may define themselves and act in terms of social categories, we may usefully conceive of social movement rhetoric as being organized so as to construct social category definitions which allow the activists' preferred course of action to be taken on by others as their own. Our theoretical argument is illustrated through the detailed analysis of category construction in contemporary U.K. anti-abortion argumentation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)261-286
    Number of pages26
    JournalHuman Relations
    Volume50
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1997

    Cite this

    @article{d3513a5f94414876a8ab4441ccd392b5,
    title = "Social movement rhetoric and the social psychology of collective action: a case study of anti-abortion mobilization",
    abstract = "This paper seeks to contribute toward an integrated approach to social movement mobilization. It does so through considering how a social psychological account of the determination of collective behavior (self-categorization theory) may be applied to the mobilization rhetoric of social movements. More specifically it argues that as people may define themselves and act in terms of social categories, we may usefully conceive of social movement rhetoric as being organized so as to construct social category definitions which allow the activists' preferred course of action to be taken on by others as their own. Our theoretical argument is illustrated through the detailed analysis of category construction in contemporary U.K. anti-abortion argumentation.",
    author = "Nick Hopkins and Steve Reicher",
    year = "1997",
    doi = "10.1177/001872679705000303",
    language = "English",
    volume = "50",
    pages = "261--286",
    journal = "Human Relations",
    issn = "0018-7267",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "3",

    }

    Social movement rhetoric and the social psychology of collective action : a case study of anti-abortion mobilization. / Hopkins, Nick ; Reicher, Steve .

    In: Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1997, p. 261-286.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Social movement rhetoric and the social psychology of collective action

    T2 - a case study of anti-abortion mobilization

    AU - Hopkins, Nick

    AU - Reicher, Steve

    PY - 1997

    Y1 - 1997

    N2 - This paper seeks to contribute toward an integrated approach to social movement mobilization. It does so through considering how a social psychological account of the determination of collective behavior (self-categorization theory) may be applied to the mobilization rhetoric of social movements. More specifically it argues that as people may define themselves and act in terms of social categories, we may usefully conceive of social movement rhetoric as being organized so as to construct social category definitions which allow the activists' preferred course of action to be taken on by others as their own. Our theoretical argument is illustrated through the detailed analysis of category construction in contemporary U.K. anti-abortion argumentation.

    AB - This paper seeks to contribute toward an integrated approach to social movement mobilization. It does so through considering how a social psychological account of the determination of collective behavior (self-categorization theory) may be applied to the mobilization rhetoric of social movements. More specifically it argues that as people may define themselves and act in terms of social categories, we may usefully conceive of social movement rhetoric as being organized so as to construct social category definitions which allow the activists' preferred course of action to be taken on by others as their own. Our theoretical argument is illustrated through the detailed analysis of category construction in contemporary U.K. anti-abortion argumentation.

    U2 - 10.1177/001872679705000303

    DO - 10.1177/001872679705000303

    M3 - Article

    VL - 50

    SP - 261

    EP - 286

    JO - Human Relations

    JF - Human Relations

    SN - 0018-7267

    IS - 3

    ER -