Soft contractualism? facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland

Michael Gregory Lloyd, Deborah Peel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Devolution in the United Kingdom has involved the creation of different quasi-autonomous political administrations. As part of an attempt to encourage institutional learning, there has been a turn to concordats to facilitate cooperation on matters of shared concern, to communicate appropriately and in a timely way, to work in a helpful and open manner and to treat information in confidence. In parallel, the reform of statutory land-use planning systems in the devolved United Kingdom has involved debates around the need for a cultural change to implement a relatively more positive model of planning and development amongst the diversity of stakeholders which have similarly invoked new forms of public diplomacy. The Edinburgh Planning Concordat sets out in some detail the agreed step-by-step actions to be effected and the respective responsibilities of the local authority and developers at the different stages in the land-use planning process. Such anticipated cooperation and coordination in the land-use planning and property development community could suggest a stronger basis for decision making and the articulation of the public interest. Locating the discussion against the backdrop of devolution and planning reform in Scotland, and within theories of new contractualism, this article examines the rise of 'soft' forms of public diplomacy as a means to facilitate cultural change and planning reform.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)239-255
    Number of pages17
    JournalUrban Research and Practice
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2012

    Fingerprint

    institutional change
    land use planning
    cultural change
    devolution
    planning
    concordat
    land use
    diplomacy
    reform
    decentralization
    planning system
    way to work
    planning process
    stakeholder
    learning
    decision making
    public interest
    confidence
    public
    responsibility

    Cite this

    @article{9140733c6319461db59e8001e18c1537,
    title = "Soft contractualism?: facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland",
    abstract = "Devolution in the United Kingdom has involved the creation of different quasi-autonomous political administrations. As part of an attempt to encourage institutional learning, there has been a turn to concordats to facilitate cooperation on matters of shared concern, to communicate appropriately and in a timely way, to work in a helpful and open manner and to treat information in confidence. In parallel, the reform of statutory land-use planning systems in the devolved United Kingdom has involved debates around the need for a cultural change to implement a relatively more positive model of planning and development amongst the diversity of stakeholders which have similarly invoked new forms of public diplomacy. The Edinburgh Planning Concordat sets out in some detail the agreed step-by-step actions to be effected and the respective responsibilities of the local authority and developers at the different stages in the land-use planning process. Such anticipated cooperation and coordination in the land-use planning and property development community could suggest a stronger basis for decision making and the articulation of the public interest. Locating the discussion against the backdrop of devolution and planning reform in Scotland, and within theories of new contractualism, this article examines the rise of 'soft' forms of public diplomacy as a means to facilitate cultural change and planning reform.",
    author = "Lloyd, {Michael Gregory} and Deborah Peel",
    note = "Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
    year = "2012",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/17535069.2012.691620",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "239--255",
    journal = "Urban Research and Practice",
    issn = "1753-5069",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "2",

    }

    Soft contractualism? facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland. / Lloyd, Michael Gregory; Peel, Deborah.

    In: Urban Research and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.07.2012, p. 239-255.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Soft contractualism?

    T2 - facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland

    AU - Lloyd, Michael Gregory

    AU - Peel, Deborah

    N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    PY - 2012/7/1

    Y1 - 2012/7/1

    N2 - Devolution in the United Kingdom has involved the creation of different quasi-autonomous political administrations. As part of an attempt to encourage institutional learning, there has been a turn to concordats to facilitate cooperation on matters of shared concern, to communicate appropriately and in a timely way, to work in a helpful and open manner and to treat information in confidence. In parallel, the reform of statutory land-use planning systems in the devolved United Kingdom has involved debates around the need for a cultural change to implement a relatively more positive model of planning and development amongst the diversity of stakeholders which have similarly invoked new forms of public diplomacy. The Edinburgh Planning Concordat sets out in some detail the agreed step-by-step actions to be effected and the respective responsibilities of the local authority and developers at the different stages in the land-use planning process. Such anticipated cooperation and coordination in the land-use planning and property development community could suggest a stronger basis for decision making and the articulation of the public interest. Locating the discussion against the backdrop of devolution and planning reform in Scotland, and within theories of new contractualism, this article examines the rise of 'soft' forms of public diplomacy as a means to facilitate cultural change and planning reform.

    AB - Devolution in the United Kingdom has involved the creation of different quasi-autonomous political administrations. As part of an attempt to encourage institutional learning, there has been a turn to concordats to facilitate cooperation on matters of shared concern, to communicate appropriately and in a timely way, to work in a helpful and open manner and to treat information in confidence. In parallel, the reform of statutory land-use planning systems in the devolved United Kingdom has involved debates around the need for a cultural change to implement a relatively more positive model of planning and development amongst the diversity of stakeholders which have similarly invoked new forms of public diplomacy. The Edinburgh Planning Concordat sets out in some detail the agreed step-by-step actions to be effected and the respective responsibilities of the local authority and developers at the different stages in the land-use planning process. Such anticipated cooperation and coordination in the land-use planning and property development community could suggest a stronger basis for decision making and the articulation of the public interest. Locating the discussion against the backdrop of devolution and planning reform in Scotland, and within theories of new contractualism, this article examines the rise of 'soft' forms of public diplomacy as a means to facilitate cultural change and planning reform.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862281732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/17535069.2012.691620

    DO - 10.1080/17535069.2012.691620

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84862281732

    VL - 5

    SP - 239

    EP - 255

    JO - Urban Research and Practice

    JF - Urban Research and Practice

    SN - 1753-5069

    IS - 2

    ER -