TY - JOUR
T1 - Sonic Screwdrivers and Tractor Beams
T2 - what the Acoustics Community often gets wrong about gradient forces versus radiation pressure
AU - Spalding, Gabriel C.
AU - Dahl, Patrick
AU - Yang, Zhengyi
AU - Glynne-Jones, Peter
AU - MacDonald, Michael P.
AU - Démoré, Christine
AU - Cochran, Sandy
N1 - No funding info
PY - 2016/4
Y1 - 2016/4
N2 - Through discussion of our sonic screwdriver and tractor beam experiments, we aim to highlight the respective advantages of conservative and non-conservative forces. Commonly in acoustic trapping, conservative, gradient-induced mechanisms (e.g., standing waves) are used to manipulate matter. Such situations are reasonably described in terms of potential energy landscapes, an approach also applied to optics, for applications such as cell sorting [MacDonald et al, Nature 426 (2003)]. No such description is possible for radiation pressure, which is non-conservative, a distinction that is sometimes muddled in the literature, although it was made clear even in early work [e.g., King, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 147 (1934); Gor’kov, Sov. Phys. Doklady 6, 773 (1962)]. Our “sonic screwdriver” makes use of two non-conservative mechanisms: levitation by radiation pressure and rotation by transfer of azimuthal momentum components [Demore et al., PRL 108 (2012)]. We also note that the term “tractor beam” has often been reserved to describe an effect involving non-conservative forces, and demonstrate an attractive force produced in such an arrangement, even against a net momentum flux [Demore et al., PRL 112 (2014)].
AB - Through discussion of our sonic screwdriver and tractor beam experiments, we aim to highlight the respective advantages of conservative and non-conservative forces. Commonly in acoustic trapping, conservative, gradient-induced mechanisms (e.g., standing waves) are used to manipulate matter. Such situations are reasonably described in terms of potential energy landscapes, an approach also applied to optics, for applications such as cell sorting [MacDonald et al, Nature 426 (2003)]. No such description is possible for radiation pressure, which is non-conservative, a distinction that is sometimes muddled in the literature, although it was made clear even in early work [e.g., King, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 147 (1934); Gor’kov, Sov. Phys. Doklady 6, 773 (1962)]. Our “sonic screwdriver” makes use of two non-conservative mechanisms: levitation by radiation pressure and rotation by transfer of azimuthal momentum components [Demore et al., PRL 108 (2012)]. We also note that the term “tractor beam” has often been reserved to describe an effect involving non-conservative forces, and demonstrate an attractive force produced in such an arrangement, even against a net momentum flux [Demore et al., PRL 112 (2014)].
KW - Sound pressure
KW - High pressure
KW - Acoustic radiation pressure
KW - Acoustic standing waves
KW - Matter waves
U2 - 10.1121/1.4950034
DO - 10.1121/1.4950034
M3 - Article
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 139
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 4
M1 - 2041
ER -