Speech acts of argumentation

inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue

Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contribution

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of speech act. Speech acts that form a part of argumentative discourse, and in particular, of argumentative dialogue, can be seen as anchors for the establishment of inferences between propositions in the domain of discourse. Most often, the speech acts that directly give rise to inference are implicit, but can be drawn out in analysis by consideration of the type of dialogue game being played. AI approaches to argumentation often focus solely on such inferences as the means by which persuasion can be effected - but this is in contrast with psychological and rhetorical models which have long recognised the role played by extra-logical features of the dialogical context. These 'peripheral' cues can not only affect persuasive effect of the logical, 'central' argumentation, but can override and dominate it. This paper presents a theory which allows both central and peripheral aspects of argumentation to be represented in a coherent analytical account based on the sequences of speech acts which constitute dialogues.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationComputational models of natural argument
    Subtitle of host publicationpapers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop
    PublisherAAAI Press
    Pages3-10
    Number of pages8
    VolumeWS-11-10
    ISBN (Print)9781577355267
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Anchor
    Speech Acts
    Argumentation
    Inference
    Logic
    Psychological
    Argumentative Discourse
    Discourse
    Persuasion
    Rhetoric

    Keywords

    • Argumentative dialogues
    • Dialogue game
    • Rhetorical model
    • Speech acts

    Cite this

    Budzynska, K., & Reed, C. (2011). Speech acts of argumentation: inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue. In Computational models of natural argument: papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop (Vol. WS-11-10, pp. 3-10). AAAI Press.
    Budzynska, Katarzyna ; Reed, Chris. / Speech acts of argumentation : inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue. Computational models of natural argument: papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop. Vol. WS-11-10 AAAI Press, 2011. pp. 3-10
    @inbook{579187f1f32747adae265f571319d6a8,
    title = "Speech acts of argumentation: inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue",
    abstract = "It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of speech act. Speech acts that form a part of argumentative discourse, and in particular, of argumentative dialogue, can be seen as anchors for the establishment of inferences between propositions in the domain of discourse. Most often, the speech acts that directly give rise to inference are implicit, but can be drawn out in analysis by consideration of the type of dialogue game being played. AI approaches to argumentation often focus solely on such inferences as the means by which persuasion can be effected - but this is in contrast with psychological and rhetorical models which have long recognised the role played by extra-logical features of the dialogical context. These 'peripheral' cues can not only affect persuasive effect of the logical, 'central' argumentation, but can override and dominate it. This paper presents a theory which allows both central and peripheral aspects of argumentation to be represented in a coherent analytical account based on the sequences of speech acts which constitute dialogues.",
    keywords = "Argumentative dialogues, Dialogue game, Rhetorical model, Speech acts",
    author = "Katarzyna Budzynska and Chris Reed",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781577355267",
    volume = "WS-11-10",
    pages = "3--10",
    booktitle = "Computational models of natural argument",
    publisher = "AAAI Press",

    }

    Budzynska, K & Reed, C 2011, Speech acts of argumentation: inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue. in Computational models of natural argument: papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop. vol. WS-11-10, AAAI Press, pp. 3-10.

    Speech acts of argumentation : inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue. / Budzynska, Katarzyna; Reed, Chris.

    Computational models of natural argument: papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop. Vol. WS-11-10 AAAI Press, 2011. p. 3-10.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contribution

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Speech acts of argumentation

    T2 - inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue

    AU - Budzynska, Katarzyna

    AU - Reed, Chris

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of speech act. Speech acts that form a part of argumentative discourse, and in particular, of argumentative dialogue, can be seen as anchors for the establishment of inferences between propositions in the domain of discourse. Most often, the speech acts that directly give rise to inference are implicit, but can be drawn out in analysis by consideration of the type of dialogue game being played. AI approaches to argumentation often focus solely on such inferences as the means by which persuasion can be effected - but this is in contrast with psychological and rhetorical models which have long recognised the role played by extra-logical features of the dialogical context. These 'peripheral' cues can not only affect persuasive effect of the logical, 'central' argumentation, but can override and dominate it. This paper presents a theory which allows both central and peripheral aspects of argumentation to be represented in a coherent analytical account based on the sequences of speech acts which constitute dialogues.

    AB - It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of speech act. Speech acts that form a part of argumentative discourse, and in particular, of argumentative dialogue, can be seen as anchors for the establishment of inferences between propositions in the domain of discourse. Most often, the speech acts that directly give rise to inference are implicit, but can be drawn out in analysis by consideration of the type of dialogue game being played. AI approaches to argumentation often focus solely on such inferences as the means by which persuasion can be effected - but this is in contrast with psychological and rhetorical models which have long recognised the role played by extra-logical features of the dialogical context. These 'peripheral' cues can not only affect persuasive effect of the logical, 'central' argumentation, but can override and dominate it. This paper presents a theory which allows both central and peripheral aspects of argumentation to be represented in a coherent analytical account based on the sequences of speech acts which constitute dialogues.

    KW - Argumentative dialogues

    KW - Dialogue game

    KW - Rhetorical model

    KW - Speech acts

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054931794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Other chapter contribution

    SN - 9781577355267

    VL - WS-11-10

    SP - 3

    EP - 10

    BT - Computational models of natural argument

    PB - AAAI Press

    ER -

    Budzynska K, Reed C. Speech acts of argumentation: inference anchors and peripheral cues in dialogue. In Computational models of natural argument: papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop. Vol. WS-11-10. AAAI Press. 2011. p. 3-10