TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholders’ perspectives on “miracle examination centres” in Nigeria
AU - Agwu, Prince
AU - Odii, Aloysius
AU - Orjiakor, Tochukwu
AU - Roy, Pallavi
AU - Nzeadibe, Chidi
AU - Onalu, Chinyere
AU - Okoye, Uzoma Odera
AU - Onwujekwe, Obinna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2022/9/28
Y1 - 2022/9/28
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the nature and operations of schools commonly regarded as “Miracle Examination Centres (MECs)” in Nigeria, through the lens of stakeholders in education. This study also assessed stakeholders’ perspectives on the possible solutions to the problem of MECs. Design/methodology/approach: The study design was a stakeholders’ approach involving 39 key actors within the examination system from northern and southern Nigeria. The stakeholders comprised people from the Ministries of Education (MoE), Examination Councils (EC), school owners and teachers, security agencies and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) who were invited to interact, interrogate and debate the subject of MECs in Nigeria. Using thematic analysis, recurrent themes were identified from the data and used for a narrative synthesis of the findings. Findings: MECs may attempt to circumvent quality assurance and regulatory requirements and may find support from prominent leaders and members of the communities through a wider informal economy. Interventions against MECs might only yield incremental results and must involve various groups like CSOs, anti-corruption agencies, EC and faith- and community-based groups. These interventions will be even more effective if the MoE will strengthen its integrity and improve its monitoring and regulatory functions without political interference. Originality/value: This paper revealed that improving examination integrity and building a solid and reliable secondary educational level in Nigeria will be achieved through the combination of horizontal and vertical approaches that involve local actors and those in authority.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the nature and operations of schools commonly regarded as “Miracle Examination Centres (MECs)” in Nigeria, through the lens of stakeholders in education. This study also assessed stakeholders’ perspectives on the possible solutions to the problem of MECs. Design/methodology/approach: The study design was a stakeholders’ approach involving 39 key actors within the examination system from northern and southern Nigeria. The stakeholders comprised people from the Ministries of Education (MoE), Examination Councils (EC), school owners and teachers, security agencies and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) who were invited to interact, interrogate and debate the subject of MECs in Nigeria. Using thematic analysis, recurrent themes were identified from the data and used for a narrative synthesis of the findings. Findings: MECs may attempt to circumvent quality assurance and regulatory requirements and may find support from prominent leaders and members of the communities through a wider informal economy. Interventions against MECs might only yield incremental results and must involve various groups like CSOs, anti-corruption agencies, EC and faith- and community-based groups. These interventions will be even more effective if the MoE will strengthen its integrity and improve its monitoring and regulatory functions without political interference. Originality/value: This paper revealed that improving examination integrity and building a solid and reliable secondary educational level in Nigeria will be achieved through the combination of horizontal and vertical approaches that involve local actors and those in authority.
KW - Anti-corruption
KW - Examination integrity
KW - Examination malpractice
KW - Miracle examination centres
KW - Stakeholders’ engagement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134916108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/QAE-12-2021-0193
DO - 10.1108/QAE-12-2021-0193
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134916108
SN - 0968-4883
VL - 30
SP - 539
EP - 554
JO - Quality Assurance in Education
JF - Quality Assurance in Education
IS - 4
ER -