Sterility Preservation of Surgical Dressing Packs Wrapped in Gumstick Lining Material

Salisu Abubakar, Nasiru Magaji Sadiq, Yusif Jibrin, Bashar Muhammad Usman, Azeezat Bolanle Adetokun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Post-sterilisation contamination is the ability of the organisms to penetrate through the wrapping material and settle on the enclosed instruments. Safeguarding the sterility of sterile dressing packs during transportation and storage is an important requirement of a sterile supply packaging system. We evaluated the use of locally available and affordable tailoring lining material popularly known as gumstick. The objective of this study was to ascertain the efficacy of gumstick lining material in safeguarding the sterility of wrapped surgical dressing instrument.

Materials and Methods: The post‑sterilisation sterility was confirmed by culturing the sterile packs and then exposed to contaminants by leaving the packs on a microbiology working bench. The wrapped packs were then contaminated with suspensions of control strains of some selected bacteria, then swabbed and cultured. The surgical packs were also exposed to environmental contaminants, swabbed and cultured.

Results: All cultures yielded no growth proving that the wrapped surgical instruments are bacteriologically sterile and gumstick provides the needed protection against contamination of surgical packs.

Conclusion: Gumstick lining material is therefore recommended as packaging material for surgical instrument particularly in resource-constrained settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-20
Number of pages3
JournalNigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences
Volume14
Issue number1
Early online date7 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Gumstick lining materials
  • sterility
  • surgical instrument

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sterility Preservation of Surgical Dressing Packs Wrapped in Gumstick Lining Material'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this