Strict liability and the rule in Caledonian Railway Co v Greenock Corporation

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Reasoning behind anomaly in Scottish law that liability for harm following alteration of course of natural stream is strict rather than fault based and whether reconsideration of Caledonian case shows element of fault is required.© 2011 Sweet & Maxwell
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)356-375
    Number of pages20
    JournalScottish Law & Practice Quarterly
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    liability
    corporation
    German Federal Railways
    Law

    Keywords

    • Nuisance (Law)
    • Rivers
    • Scotland
    • Strict liability

    Cite this

    @article{50a0415ab90a415e9212ce289c02a9b2,
    title = "Strict liability and the rule in Caledonian Railway Co v Greenock Corporation",
    abstract = "Reasoning behind anomaly in Scottish law that liability for harm following alteration of course of natural stream is strict rather than fault based and whether reconsideration of Caledonian case shows element of fault is required.{\circledC} 2011 Sweet & Maxwell",
    keywords = "Nuisance (Law), Rivers, Scotland, Strict liability",
    author = "Gordon Cameron",
    note = "dc.publisher: T & T Clark",
    year = "2000",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "356--375",
    journal = "Scottish Law & Practice Quarterly",
    issn = "1360-7782",
    number = "4",

    }

    Strict liability and the rule in Caledonian Railway Co v Greenock Corporation. / Cameron, Gordon.

    In: Scottish Law & Practice Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2000, p. 356-375.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Strict liability and the rule in Caledonian Railway Co v Greenock Corporation

    AU - Cameron, Gordon

    N1 - dc.publisher: T & T Clark

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - Reasoning behind anomaly in Scottish law that liability for harm following alteration of course of natural stream is strict rather than fault based and whether reconsideration of Caledonian case shows element of fault is required.© 2011 Sweet & Maxwell

    AB - Reasoning behind anomaly in Scottish law that liability for harm following alteration of course of natural stream is strict rather than fault based and whether reconsideration of Caledonian case shows element of fault is required.© 2011 Sweet & Maxwell

    KW - Nuisance (Law)

    KW - Rivers

    KW - Scotland

    KW - Strict liability

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 356

    EP - 375

    JO - Scottish Law & Practice Quarterly

    JF - Scottish Law & Practice Quarterly

    SN - 1360-7782

    IS - 4

    ER -