Abstract
Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as 'structured argumentation'. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one another.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 395-399 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Argumentation |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 2 Aug 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2014 |