Structured arguments and their aggregation: A reply to selinger

Chris Reed

doi:10.1007/s10503-014-9327-1

Structured arguments and their aggregation: A reply to selinger

Chris Reed (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as 'structured argumentation'. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one another.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	395-399
Number of pages	5
Journal	Argumentation
Volume	28
Issue number	3
Early online date	2 Aug 2014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9327-1
Publication status	Published - Aug 2014

Access to Document

10.1007/s10503-014-9327-1

Cite this

@article{701d0bd3e59140928b325e7d1519572e,

title = "Structured arguments and their aggregation: A reply to selinger",

abstract = "Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as 'structured argumentation'. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one another.",

author = "Chris Reed",

year = "2014",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1007/s10503-014-9327-1",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "395--399",

journal = "Argumentation",

issn = "0920-427X",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured arguments and their aggregation

T2 - A reply to selinger

AU - Reed, Chris

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as 'structured argumentation'. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one another.

AB - Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as 'structured argumentation'. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one another.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84957433957

U2 - 10.1007/s10503-014-9327-1

DO - 10.1007/s10503-014-9327-1

M3 - Article

SN - 0920-427X

VL - 28

SP - 395

EP - 399

JO - Argumentation

JF - Argumentation

IS - 3

ER -

Structured arguments and their aggregation: A reply to selinger

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this